Suppr超能文献

骨折固定后 X 光片:是良医还是医疗法律保护?

Post-splinting radiographs of minimally displaced fractures: good medicine or medicolegal protection?

机构信息

NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, Suite 1402, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 5;94(17):e128. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00944.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many institutions perform radiographic documentation following splint application even when no manipulation had been performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of post-splinting radiographs of acute non-displaced or minimally displaced fractures that did not undergo manipulation. Our hypothesis was that post-splinting radiographs do not demonstrate changes in fracture alignment or impact the management of the patient.

METHODS

After institutional review board exemption had been granted, consultations performed by orthopaedic residents at a level-I trauma center from September 2008 to April 2010 were reviewed. Of 2862 consultations, 1321 involved acute fractures that were splinted. Radiographs revealed that 342 (25.9%) of the fractures were non-displaced or minimally displaced and angulated (defined as <5 mm and <10°, respectively) and 204 of them had been assessed with radiographs after splinting. Consults were reviewed to ensure that the patients had not undergone manipulation prior to or during splinting. Consult notes and radiographs obtained in the emergency room (ER), as well as follow-up radiographs, were reviewed to assess ultimate outcome.

RESULTS

None of the 204 fractures (134 non-displaced and seventy minimally displaced) changed alignment following splinting. Two splints were reapplied, and the fractures sites were reimaged for undocumented reasons. Patients were subjected to an average of ten radiographs (range, four to twenty-five radiographs) of their extremities in the acute setting. On average, three post-splinting radiographs (range, one to ten radiographs) were obtained. The mean time between the initial and post-splinting radiographs was three hours and thirty minutes (range, nine minutes to twenty-four hours). The most common injury was a fracture about the hand or wrist. The 122 patients with that type of injury waited an average of almost three hours for an average of three post-splinting radiographs, contributing to a total of nine radiographs performed acutely. ER visits tended to be longer for patients with post-splinting radiographs compared with those without them (p = 0.06). Follow-up radiographs were available for eighty-two patients. All fractures demonstrated maintained alignment.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-splinting radiographs of non-displaced and minimally displaced fractures that do not undergo manipulation before or during immobilization are associated with longer ER waits, additional radiation exposure, and increased health-care costs without providing helpful information. While certain circumstances call for additional imaging, routine performance of post-splinting radiography of non-displaced or minimally displaced fractures should be discouraged.

摘要

背景

许多机构在夹板应用后会进行影像学记录,即使没有进行操作。本研究的目的是评估未进行操作的急性无移位或轻度移位骨折夹板固定后的影像学检查的作用。我们的假设是,夹板固定后的影像学检查不会改变骨折对线,也不会影响患者的处理。

方法

在获得机构审查委员会豁免后,回顾了 2008 年 9 月至 2010 年 4 月期间,一级创伤中心的骨科住院医师进行的会诊。在 2862 次会诊中,有 1321 次涉及急性骨折,这些骨折均进行了夹板固定。影像学检查显示,342 例(25.9%)骨折为无移位或轻度移位和成角(分别定义为<5mm 和<10°),其中 204 例在夹板固定后进行了影像学检查。对会诊记录进行了审查,以确保患者在夹板固定前或固定过程中没有进行操作。审查了急诊室(ER)获得的会诊记录和影像学检查以及随访影像学检查,以评估最终结果。

结果

204 例骨折(134 例无移位和 70 例轻度移位)在夹板固定后均未改变对线。有两例夹板重新应用,且由于未记录的原因重新拍摄了骨折部位的影像学检查。患者在急性情况下平均接受了 10 次(范围为 4 至 25 次)四肢影像学检查。平均获得 3 次(范围为 1 至 10 次)夹板固定后的影像学检查。初始和夹板固定后的影像学检查之间的平均时间为 3 小时 30 分钟(范围为 9 分钟至 24 小时)。最常见的损伤是手或腕部骨折。122 例此类损伤患者平均等待近 3 小时,平均接受 3 次夹板固定后的影像学检查,总共在急性情况下进行了 9 次影像学检查。与未进行夹板固定后的影像学检查的患者相比,进行了夹板固定后的影像学检查的患者 ER 就诊时间更长(p=0.06)。有 82 例患者获得了随访影像学检查。所有骨折均保持对线良好。

结论

对于未在固定前或固定期间进行操作的无移位和轻度移位骨折,夹板固定后的影像学检查会导致 ER 等待时间延长、额外的辐射暴露以及增加医疗保健费用,而不会提供有用的信息。虽然某些情况下需要额外的影像学检查,但不建议常规进行无移位或轻度移位骨折夹板固定后的影像学检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验