Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Jun;45(2):372-82. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0252-7.
Social psychological research suggests that two distinct dimensions describe lay conceptions of humanness: a species-typical sense (i.e., human nature) and a species-unique sense (i.e., human uniqueness). Although these two senses of humanness have been discerned among psychological traits and states, there has been no systematic research into lay beliefs about the humanness of human behaviors. Using a range of 60 prosocial, nonsocial, and antisocial behaviors, it was demonstrated that people discriminate between species-typical and species-unique behaviors and that the capacity to perform species-unique behaviors distinguishes humans from animals, whereas the capacity to perform species-typical behaviors distinguishes humans from robots. Behaviors that exemplify the two senses of humanness are identified, and data representing rankings, raw scores, and z-scores in two indices of species typicality and species uniqueness are provided. Taken together, these findings expand our understanding of lay conceptions of humanness and provide researchers of humanness with a wider range of validated stimuli to probe the boundaries of humanity.
社会心理学研究表明,两种不同的维度可以描述人们对人性的概念:一种是物种典型的感觉(即人性),另一种是物种独特的感觉(即人类的独特性)。尽管这些人性的两个方面已经在心理特征和状态中得到了区分,但对于人类行为的人性的基本信念,还没有进行系统的研究。使用一系列 60 种亲社会、非社会和反社会行为,研究表明人们可以区分物种典型和物种独特的行为,而具有物种独特行为的能力将人类与动物区分开来,而具有物种典型行为的能力则将人类与机器人区分开来。确定了体现这两种人性概念的行为,并提供了两个物种典型性和物种独特性指标的排名、原始分数和 z 分数的数据。总的来说,这些发现扩展了我们对人性基本概念的理解,并为研究人性的研究人员提供了更广泛的经过验证的刺激,以探究人类的边界。