Wiley J M, Smith N, Leventhal B G, Graham M L, Strauss L C, Hurwitz C A, Modlin J, Mellits D, Baumgardner R, Corden B J
Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
J Clin Oncol. 1990 Feb;8(2):280-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.2.280.
We evaluated the courses of 115 consecutive cases of pediatric acute leukemia treated with induction chemotherapy. Seventy-two patients developed fever associated with neutropenia; 15 developed systemic fungal infections. We reviewed multiple demographic and treatment characteristics of these patients in an attempt to identify potential risk factors for the development of invasive fungal disease (IFD). Risk factors identified in a univariate analysis included duration of neutropenia after first fever (P less than .0001), diagnosis of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) (P = .003), onset of fever and neutropenia within 5 days of starting induction chemotherapy (P = .009), and multiple (greater than one) surveillance culture sites positive for fungal organisms (P = .02). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, duration of neutropenia (P less than .001) remained a significant risk factor. The study group of patients had a significantly higher risk of fungal infections than a matched group of leukemia patients developing fever with neutropenia due to postremission consolidation chemotherapy (P = .003). In the first 48 patients, 14 (29%) developed IFD. In the subsequent patients (n = 24), intravenous miconazole (5 mg/kg every 8 hours) was begun at the time of the first fever. One of the 24 patients (4%) given miconazole developed IFD. The use of miconazole was a negative risk factor for the development of IFD in univariate (P = .01) and multivariate (P = .05) analysis. We conclude that pediatric leukemia patients who develop fever associated with neutropenia during induction chemotherapy are at high risk for developing IFD. The role of intravenous miconazole at the time of the first fever in this group deserves further study.
我们评估了115例接受诱导化疗的小儿急性白血病连续病例的病程。72例患者出现与中性粒细胞减少相关的发热;15例发生系统性真菌感染。我们回顾了这些患者的多项人口统计学和治疗特征,试图确定侵袭性真菌病(IFD)发生的潜在危险因素。单因素分析确定的危险因素包括首次发热后中性粒细胞减少的持续时间(P<0.0001)、急性非淋巴细胞白血病(ANLL)的诊断(P = 0.003)、开始诱导化疗后5天内发热和中性粒细胞减少的发作(P = 0.009)以及多个(大于1个)真菌生物监测培养部位阳性(P = 0.02)。在多因素逻辑回归分析中,中性粒细胞减少的持续时间(P<0.001)仍然是一个显著的危险因素。与因缓解后巩固化疗而出现发热伴中性粒细胞减少的白血病患者匹配组相比,该研究组患者发生真菌感染的风险显著更高(P = 0.003)。在前48例患者中,14例(29%)发生IFD。在随后的患者(n = 24)中,在首次发热时开始静脉注射咪康唑(每8小时5mg/kg)。接受咪康唑治疗的24例患者中有1例(4%)发生IFD。在单因素(P = 0.01)和多因素(P = 0.05)分析中,咪康唑的使用是IFD发生的负性危险因素。我们得出结论,在诱导化疗期间出现与中性粒细胞减少相关发热的小儿白血病患者发生IFD的风险很高。该组患者首次发热时静脉注射咪康唑的作用值得进一步研究。