• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

摒弃国民医疗服务体系中的单一支付方制度:英国卫生部如何从美国汲取错误教训。

Ditching the single-payer system in the national health service: how the English Department of Health is learning the wrong lessons from the United States.

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(3):539-47. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.3.i.

DOI:10.2190/HS.42.3.i
PMID:22993967
Abstract

Reforms to the British National Health Service introduce major changes to how health care will be delivered. The core elements include the creation of new purchaser organizations, Clinical Commissioning Groups, which unlike their predecessors will be able to recruit and reject general practices and their patients without geographical restriction. The Clinical Commissioning Groups are to transition from statutory bodies to freestanding organizations, with most of their functions privatized and an increasingly privatized system of provision, In this paper, we explore the likely consequences of these proposals, drawing in particular on the experience of managed care organizations in the United States, whose approach has influenced the English proposals extensively. We argue that the wrong lessons are being learned and the English reforms are likely to fundamentally undermine the principles on which the British National Health Service was founded.

摘要

英国国民医疗服务体系的改革对医疗保健的提供方式带来了重大变化。核心要素包括创建新的采购组织——临床委托团体,与以往不同的是,它们将能够不受地域限制招募和拒绝一般实践及其患者。临床委托团体将从法定机构过渡到独立组织,其大部分职能私有化,提供服务的系统日益私有化。在本文中,我们特别借鉴了美国管理式医疗组织的经验,探讨了这些建议可能带来的后果。我们认为,人们吸取了错误的教训,英国的改革可能从根本上破坏英国国民医疗服务体系建立的原则。

相似文献

1
Ditching the single-payer system in the national health service: how the English Department of Health is learning the wrong lessons from the United States.摒弃国民医疗服务体系中的单一支付方制度:英国卫生部如何从美国汲取错误教训。
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(3):539-47. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.3.i.
2
Single-payer national health insurance. Physicians' views.单一支付者国家医疗保险。医生的观点。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Feb 9;164(3):300-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.3.300.
3
The perils of single-payer health care.
Minn Med. 2004 Apr;87(4):6-8.
4
National health care reform and a single-payer system: messiah or pariah?国家医疗保健改革与单一支付者制度:救世主还是贱民?
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1997 Winter;19(3):341-56.
5
The National Health Service in the United Kingdom: model for the United States?英国国民医疗服务体系:美国的典范?
J Med Assoc Ga. 1993 Dec;82(12):643-5.
6
Diametrically opposed.截然相反。
Mod Healthc. 2011 May 16;41(20):6-7, 16, 1.
7
Why the United States should adopt a single-payer system of health care finance.为何美国应采用单一支付者医疗保健融资体系。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Jun;6(2):145-60. doi: 10.1353/ken.1996.0011.
8
Arguments for a single-payer national health insurance program.
Nurse Pract. 2000 Nov;25(11):8, 11.
9
Moving toward managed care: the United Kingdom National Health Service reforms.迈向管理式医疗:英国国民医疗服务体系改革
Health Care Manag. 1995 Oct;2(1):151-60.
10
Health care reform: clarifying the concepts.医疗保健改革:厘清概念。
J Community Health Nurs. 1993;10(4):199-211. doi: 10.1207/s15327655jchn1004_1.

引用本文的文献

1
GPs in UK: From Health Gatekeepers in Primary Care to Health Agents in Primary Health Care.英国的全科医生:从初级医疗保健中的健康守门人到初级卫生保健中的健康推动者。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Sep 20;16:1929-1939. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S416934. eCollection 2023.