Gordon John-Stewart
Cologne University, Germany.
Bioethics. 2014 May;28(4):203-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.02004.x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
In his article 'Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts' David Archard attempts to show that his argument from common-sense morality is more convincing than other competing arguments in the debate. I examine his main line of argumentation and eventually refute his main argument in my reply.
在其《为何道德哲学家不是且不应成为道德专家》一文中，大卫·阿查德试图表明，在这场辩论中，他基于常识道德的论证比其他竞争性论证更具说服力。在我的回应中，我审视了他的主要论证思路，并最终反驳了他的主要论点。
