Suppr超能文献

足月臀位时行外倒转术的禁忌证:系统评价。

Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Feb;92(2):137-42. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12011. Epub 2012 Nov 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

External cephalic version (ECV) is a safe and effective intervention that can prevent breech delivery, thus reducing the need for cesarean delivery. It is recommended in national guidelines. These guidelines also mention contraindications for ECV, and thereby restrict the application of ECV. We assessed whether the formulation of these contraindications in guidelines are based on empiric data.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

POPULATION

Pregnant women with a singleton breech presentation from 34 weeks.

METHODS

We searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (1953-2009), EMBASE (1980-2009), TRIP database (until 2011), NHS (National Health Services, until 2011), Diseases database (until 2011) and NICE guidelines (until 2011) for existing guidelines on ECV and studied the reproducibility of the contraindications stated in the guidelines. Furthermore, we systematically reviewed the literature for contraindications and evidence on these contraindications.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Contraindications of ECV.

RESULTS

We found five guidelines mentioning 18 contraindications, varying from five to 13 per guideline. The contraindications were not reproducible between the guidelines with oligohydramnios as the only contraindication mentioned in all guidelines. The literature search yielded 60 studies reporting on 39 different contraindications, of which we could only assess evidence of six of them.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that there is no general consensus on the eligibility of patients for ECV. Therefore we propose to limit contraindications for ECV to clear empirical evidence or to those with a clear pathophysiological relevance.

摘要

目的

外倒转术(ECV)是一种安全有效的干预措施,可预防臀位分娩,从而减少剖宫产的需求。该措施被推荐应用于国家指南中。这些指南还提到了 ECV 的禁忌症,从而限制了 ECV 的应用。我们评估了这些指南中禁忌症的制定是否基于经验数据。

设计

系统评价。

人群

34 周单胎臀位孕妇。

方法

我们在国家指南清除库、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE(1953-2009)、EMBASE(1980-2009)、TRIP 数据库(截至 2011 年)、NHS(国家卫生服务,截至 2011 年)、疾病数据库(截至 2011 年)和 NICE 指南(截至 2011 年)中搜索现有的 ECV 指南,并研究了指南中规定的禁忌症的重现性。此外,我们系统地回顾了有关禁忌症的文献和这些禁忌症的证据。

主要结果测量

ECV 的禁忌症。

结果

我们发现有 5 个指南提到了 18 个禁忌症,每个指南的禁忌症数量从 5 个到 13 个不等。这些指南之间的禁忌症并不一致,羊水过少是所有指南中唯一提到的禁忌症。文献检索得到了 60 项研究报告的 39 种不同禁忌症,但我们只能评估其中 6 种的证据。

结论

本研究表明,目前对于患者是否适合接受 ECV 并没有普遍共识。因此,我们建议将 ECV 的禁忌症限制在有明确经验证据或有明确病理生理学相关性的禁忌症。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验