Suppr超能文献

缩短聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎。

Shortened peginterferon and ribavirin treatment for chronic hepatitis C.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Oct;28(4):398-406. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000463. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peginterferon alfa and ribavirin combination therapy is an effective treatment for many patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). Reducing the length of treatment may be advantageous. We performed a systematic review and economic evaluation to assess shorter treatment duration of this regimen.

METHODS

We searched fourteen bibliographic databases (including The Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase) from 2000 to October 2009 and consulted experts and drug manufacturers. Eligible articles were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) selected according to predefined criteria. We undertook an economic evaluation to assess the cost-effectiveness of shortened treatment versus standard treatment in the UK.

RESULTS

Six trials were included. In the sub-group of patients who had low viral load (LVL) and a rapid virological response (RVR), there were no statistically significant differences in sustained virological response (SVR) rates between patients who received standard treatment (range, 83 percent to 100 percent) and those who received shortened courses (range 84 percent to 96 percent) (24 weeks for genotype 1, 16 weeks for genotype 2/3). Shortened treatment resulted in cost savings, but in some scenarios also resulted in poorer outcome, compared with standard treatment. This requires a judgment to be made on the value of the quality-adjusted life-year loss resulting from adopting a shorter treatment regimen, if shorter treatment is associated with a lower SVR than standard treatment duration.

CONCLUSIONS

For chronic HCV patients who have LVL and achieve an RVR, shortened peginterferon and ribavirin combination therapy could be considered as a viable treatment option.

摘要

背景

聚乙二醇干扰素 α 和利巴韦林联合疗法是治疗许多慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)患者的有效方法。减少治疗时间可能是有利的。我们进行了一项系统评价和经济评估,以评估这种方案的较短治疗时间。

方法

我们从 2000 年到 2009 年 10 月检索了 14 个文献数据库(包括 Cochrane 图书馆、Medline 和 Embase),并咨询了专家和药品制造商。合格的文章是根据预设标准选择的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们进行了一项经济评估,以评估在英国缩短治疗与标准治疗的成本效益。

结果

纳入了六项试验。在病毒载量低(LVL)和快速病毒学应答(RVR)的亚组患者中,接受标准治疗(范围为 83%至 100%)和接受缩短疗程(范围为 84%至 96%)的患者的持续病毒学应答(SVR)率没有统计学上的显著差异(基因型 1 的治疗时间为 24 周,基因型 2/3 的治疗时间为 16 周)。与标准治疗相比,缩短治疗可节省成本,但在某些情况下也会导致结局较差。如果缩短治疗与标准治疗时间相比导致 SVR 较低,则需要对采用缩短治疗方案导致的质量调整生命年损失的价值做出判断。

结论

对于病毒载量低且实现快速病毒学应答的慢性 HCV 患者,缩短聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林联合疗法可能是一种可行的治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验