Suppr超能文献

评估和改善工作场所健康:将主观和客观措施与 STress Assessment 和 Research Toolkit (St.A.R.T.) 方法相结合。

Assessing and improving health in the workplace: an integration of subjective and objective measures with the STress Assessment and Research Toolkit (St.A.R.T.) method.

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Parma, Via Kennedy, Parma, 6 43100, Italy.

出版信息

J Occup Med Toxicol. 2012 Sep 20;7(1):18. doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-7-18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this work was to introduce a new combined method of subjective and objective measures to assess psychosocial risk factors at work and improve workers' health and well-being. In the literature most of the research on work-related stress focuses on self-report measures and this work represents the first methodology capable of integrating different sources of data.

METHOD

An integrated method entitled St.A.R.T. (STress Assessment and Research Toolkit) was used in order to assess psychosocial risk factors and two health outcomes. In particular, a self-report questionnaire combined with an observational structured checklist was administered to 113 workers from an Italian retail company.

RESULTS

The data showed a correlation between subjective data and the rating data of the observational checklist for the psychosocial risk factors related to work contexts such as customer relationship management and customer queue. Conversely, the factors related to work content (workload and boredom) measured with different methods (subjective vs. objective) showed a discrepancy. Furthermore, subjective measures of psychosocial risk factors were more predictive of workers' psychological health and exhaustion than rating data. The different objective measures played different roles, however, in terms of their influence on the two health outcomes considered.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to integrate self-related assessment of stressors with objective measures for a better understanding of workers' conditions in the workplace. The method presented could be considered a useful methodology for combining the two measures and differentiating the impact of different psychological risk factors related to work content and context on workers' health.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在引入一种新的主观和客观测量相结合的方法,以评估工作中的社会心理风险因素,提高员工的健康和幸福感。在文献中,大多数与工作相关的压力研究都集中在自我报告的测量方法上,而这项工作代表了第一个能够整合不同数据来源的方法。

方法

采用一种名为 St.A.R.T.(压力评估和研究工具包)的综合方法来评估社会心理风险因素和两个健康结果。具体来说,对一家意大利零售公司的 113 名员工进行了自我报告问卷和观察结构化清单的结合使用。

结果

数据显示,与客户关系管理和客户队列等工作环境相关的社会心理风险因素的主观数据与观察清单的评分数据之间存在相关性。相反,使用不同方法(主观与客观)测量的与工作内容相关的因素(工作量和无聊感)存在差异。此外,社会心理风险因素的主观测量对工人的心理健康和疲惫感的预测作用大于评分数据。然而,不同的客观测量在两个健康结果方面的影响程度不同。

结论

将压力源的自我评估与客观测量相结合对于更好地了解工人在工作场所的状况非常重要。所提出的方法可以被认为是一种有用的方法,用于结合这两种测量方法,并区分与工作内容和环境相关的不同心理风险因素对工人健康的影响。

相似文献

8
The JDCS Model and Blue-Collar Bullying: Decent Working Conditions for a Healthy Environment.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 14;16(18):3411. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183411.
10
Psychosocial work environment of hospital workers: validation of a comprehensive assessment scale.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jul;44(5):814-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.008. Epub 2006 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Stress and performance: do service orientation and emotional energy moderate the relationship?
J Occup Health Psychol. 2012 Jan;17(1):116-28. doi: 10.1037/a0026064. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
2
A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort-reward imbalance.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009 Aug;82(8):1005-13. doi: 10.1007/s00420-008-0384-3. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
3
Available instruments for measurement of psychosocial factors in the work environment.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 Oct;82(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00420-008-0312-6. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
5
Assessing the psychosocial work environment--"subjective" versus "objective" measurement.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005 Dec;31(6):405-8. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.946.
6
On cross-sectional questionnaire studies of relationships between psychosocial conditions at work and health--are they reliable?
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005 Aug;78(7):517-22. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0618-6. Epub 2005 Jul 2.
7
Working conditions and three types of well-being: a longitudinal study with self-report and rating data.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2005 Jan;10(1):31-43. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.1.31.
9
Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: a general perspective.
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Aug;89(4):647-60. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.647.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验