Goytia Robin N, Jones Lynne C, Hungerford Marc W
Joint Experience, Johns Hopkins Orthopaedics at Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2012 Summer;21(2):78-83. doi: 10.3113/jsoa.2012.0078.
The anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty has the advantages of using intermuscular and internervous planes, but it is technically demanding. We evaluated the learning curve for this approach with regard to operative parameters and immediate outcomes. From November 2005 through May 2007, 73 patients underwent 81 consecutive primary anterior-approach total hip arthroplasties. We grouped the hips into three consecutive groups of 20 and one of 21, and surgical and fluoroscopy times, estimated blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, patient comorbidities, component position, and leg-length discrepancy were compared (statistical significance, p < 0.05). Comparing Groups 1 and 4, there were only two significant differences: operative time, 124 to 98 minutes, respectively, and estimated blood loss, 596 to 347 mL, respectively. Proficiency improved after Group 2 (40 cases) and was more marked after Group 3 (60 cases), with no major complications. Surgeons considering this approach should expect a substantial learning period.
全髋关节置换术的前路手术具有利用肌间隙和神经间隙平面的优点,但技术要求较高。我们从手术参数和近期疗效方面评估了该手术方式的学习曲线。2005年11月至2007年5月,73例患者连续接受了81例初次前路全髋关节置换术。我们将这些髋关节分为连续的三组,每组20例,另一组21例,比较了手术时间、透视时间、估计失血量、术中和术后并发症、患者合并症、假体位置及双下肢长度差异(统计学意义,p < 0.05)。比较第1组和第4组,仅有两个显著差异:手术时间分别为124分钟和98分钟,估计失血量分别为596毫升和347毫升。在第2组(40例)之后熟练程度有所提高,在第3组(60例)之后更为明显,且无严重并发症。考虑采用该手术方式的外科医生应预期有一个较长的学习期。