• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在新手外科医生的学习曲线期间恢复髋关节生物力学:直接前路手术与后路手术的比较

Restoring hip biomechanics during the learning curve of a novice surgeon: Direct anterior approach vs posterior approach.

作者信息

Pujol Oriol, Soza Diego, Lara Yuri, Castellanos Sara, Hernández Alejandro, Barro Víctor

机构信息

Hip Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona Departament de Cirurgia, Barcelona, Spain.

Hip Surgery Unit, Orthopedic Surgery Department, Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2021 Jul 13;26:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.07.014. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2021.07.014
PMID:34349397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8319457/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It remains controversial whether the direct anterior approach (DAA) or the posterior approach (PA) allows better restoration of hip biomechanics after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Besides, it is not certain which approach is best for a novice surgeon to avoid implant malposition, neither during the learning curve nor once the curve plateau has been reached.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of THAs operated on between 2014 and 2019 by a single novice surgeon (DAA, n = 187; PA, n = 184). The surgeon used both approaches, and thus went through parallel learning curves.

RESULTS

While the DAA presented a greater number of acetabular cup implantations within Lewinnek's "safe zone" for inclination (84.5% vs. 79.3%; p = 0.003), the PA returned superior results for anteversion (77.7% vs. 68.4%; p = 0.000). The PA showed a tendency to verticalize acetabular cups, while the DAA tended to antevert them. The DAA resulted in fewer patients with leg length discrepancy (3.2% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.041). No differences were found in stem coronal alignment or femoral offset.

CONCLUSION

Both approaches are safe and reliable for restoring hip biomechanics through THA surgery during the learning curve of a novice hip surgeon. Similar radiological outcomes are also seen once the surgeon has reached the learning curve plateau.

摘要

引言

全髋关节置换术(THA)后,直接前路(DAA)或后路(PA)是否能更好地恢复髋关节生物力学仍存在争议。此外,对于新手外科医生而言,不确定哪种方法最能避免植入物位置不当,无论是在学习曲线期间还是达到曲线平稳期之后。

方法

我们对一位新手外科医生在2014年至2019年间进行的THA手术进行了回顾性队列研究(DAA组,n = 187;PA组,n = 184)。该外科医生使用了两种方法,因此经历了平行的学习曲线。

结果

虽然DAA在Lewinnek倾斜“安全区”内的髋臼杯植入数量更多(84.5%对79.3%;p = 0.003),但PA在前倾方面的结果更佳(77.7%对68.4%;p = 0.000)。PA显示出使髋臼杯垂直化的趋势,而DAA则倾向于使其前倾。DAA导致腿长差异的患者较少(3.2%对8.2%,p = 0.041)。在股骨柄冠状位对线或股骨偏心距方面未发现差异。

结论

在新手髋关节外科医生的学习曲线期间,两种方法通过THA手术恢复髋关节生物力学都是安全可靠的。一旦外科医生达到学习曲线平稳期,也会出现类似的放射学结果。

相似文献

1
Restoring hip biomechanics during the learning curve of a novice surgeon: Direct anterior approach vs posterior approach.在新手外科医生的学习曲线期间恢复髋关节生物力学:直接前路手术与后路手术的比较
J Orthop. 2021 Jul 13;26:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.07.014. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.
2
Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach?与非导向的后入路相比,髋关节置换术前路透视是否会降低髋臼杯的可变性?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1877-85. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3512-2. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
3
Surgeons changing the approach for total hip arthroplasty from posterior to direct anterior with fluoroscopy should consider potential excessive cup anteversion and flexion implantation of the stem in their early experience.在透视引导下将全髋关节置换术的手术入路从后路改为直接前路的外科医生,在其早期经验中应考虑髋臼杯可能过度前倾以及股骨柄植入时过度屈曲的情况。
Int Orthop. 2016 Sep;40(9):1813-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3059-1. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
4
Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek's safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls.能否定义一个比Lewinnek安全区更安全的目标区域来预防全髋关节置换术的不稳定?对56例髋关节置换术后脱位患者和93例匹配对照进行病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Sep;103(5):657-661. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
5
Clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty with Collum Femoris Preserving stems: a comparison between the direct anterior approach and the posterior approach.采用保留股骨颈的髁支撑型假体行初次全髋关节置换术的临床和影像学结果:直接前入路与后外侧入路的比较
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 22;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05040-2.
6
Primary total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach in the lateral decubitus position : surgical technique, learning curve, complications, and early results.直接前侧入路侧卧位行初次全髋关节置换术:手术技术、学习曲线、并发症及早期结果。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jul;103-B(7 Supple B):53-58. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-2460.R1.
7
Adoption of Robotic vs Fluoroscopic Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Acetabular Positioning Improved in the Learning Curve?全髋关节置换术中机器人引导与透视引导的应用:在学习曲线中髋臼位置是否得到改善?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.039. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
8
The learning curve of robotic-arm assisted acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty.机器人辅助髋臼杯定位在全髋关节置换术中的学习曲线。
Hip Int. 2021 May;31(3):311-319. doi: 10.1177/1120700019889334. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
9
Does the thigh circumference affect the positioning of the acetabular component when using the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty?在全髋关节置换术中使用直接前入路时,大腿围度会影响髋臼组件的定位吗?
Bone Joint J. 2019 May;101-B(5):529-535. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-0847.R2.
10
Acetabular and Femoral Component Positioning Using Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中采用直接前路与后路的髋臼和股骨组件定位
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Mar 10;55(5):1215-1224. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00343-9. eCollection 2021 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty performed by direct anterior approach: a systematic review comparing surgical approaches and strategies for prevention.直接前路全髋关节置换术后的肢体长度差异:一项比较手术入路及预防策略的系统评价
EFORT Open Rev. 2024 Aug 1;9(8):733-744. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0116.
2
The impact of operative approach and intraoperative imaging on leg length discrepancy and acetabular component angle in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.手术入路和术中影像学对全髋关节置换术后下肢长度差异和髋臼组件角度的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int Orthop. 2024 Feb;48(2):473-479. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05962-z. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
3
Direct Anterior versus Lateral Approach for Femoral Neck Fracture: Role in COVID-19 Disease.股骨颈骨折的直接前路与外侧入路:在COVID-19疾病中的作用
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 16;11(16):4785. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164785.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical reconstruction parameters obtained after direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty do not compromise clinical outcome.直接前路全髋关节置换术后获得的生物力学重建参数不会影响临床疗效。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Dec;30(8):1463-1470. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02727-x. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
2
Surgical Approach and Reaming Depth Influence the Direction and Magnitude of Acetabular Center of Rotation Changes During Total Hip Arthroplasty.手术入路和扩髓深度影响全髋关节置换术中髋臼旋转中心变化的方向和幅度。
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Jun 17;6(3):414-421. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.04.003. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Direct anterior versus posterolateral approaches for clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接前方入路与后外侧入路在全髋关节置换术后临床疗效的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jun 23;15(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01747-x.
4
Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterolateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.直接前入路与后外侧入路在全髋关节置换术中的比较:随机对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug;12(4):1065-1073. doi: 10.1111/os.12669. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
Total hip arthroplasty performed by direct anterior approach - Does experience influence the learning curve?直接前路全髋关节置换术——经验会影响学习曲线吗?
SICOT J. 2020;6:15. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2020015. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
6
Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty between direct anterior approach and posterior approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接前入路与后入路初次全髋关节置换术的临床、功能和影像学结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 2;21(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03318-x.
7
The direct anterior approach provokes varus stem alignment when using a collarless straight tapered stem.当使用无领直锥形髓腔锉时,直接前侧入路会导致股骨柄内翻对线。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Jun;141(6):891-897. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03457-9. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
Transitioning the total hip arthroplasty technique from posterior approach in lateral position to direct anterior approach in supine position-risk factors for acetabular malpositioning and the learning curve.将全髋关节置换术技术从侧卧位的后入路改为仰卧位的直接前入路——髋臼位置不良的危险因素和学习曲线。
Int Orthop. 2020 Sep;44(9):1669-1676. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04583-0. Epub 2020 May 11.
9
Implant positioning among the surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.髋关节置换术的手术入路中植入物的定位:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Aug;140(8):1115-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03448-w. Epub 2020 May 2.
10
Hip Offset and Leg Length Equalization in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty without Preoperative Templating.无术前模板的直接前路全髋关节置换术中的髋关节偏移和肢体长度均衡
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2019 Nov;78(11 Suppl 2):26-28.