• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

核医学心脏学的发展实践:来自 2011 年 ASNC 成员调查的结果。

The evolving practice of nuclear cardiology: results from the 2011 ASNC member survey.

机构信息

The Miriam Hospital, Brown University, 164 Summit Avenue, Providence, RI 02906, USA.

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Dec;19(6):1170-5. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9624-8. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1007/s12350-012-9624-8
PMID:22996832
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Today's imaging laboratories face challenges including reimbursement, prior authorization, and accreditation standards. The impact on the practice of nuclear cardiology in the United States is unknown. We conducted a survey of ASNC members to provide a snapshot of nuclear cardiology imaging laboratories in 2011.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The survey identified practice patterns including personnel, volumes, protocols used, and laboratory characteristics. We employed random sampling methodology stratified geographically. The response rate was 19.5% (73/374 laboratories). A non-random survey conducted in 2001 of 25 laboratories served as a comparator. A total of 73 laboratories, representing 202 physicians and 177 technologists responded. The reported median procedural volume was 1,225 studies annually; 88.9% of laboratories were accredited. Compared with 2001, dual isotope imaging protocol use dropped from 72% to 15.6%. Five markers of quality were surveyed. Half of laboratories use the American College of Cardiology's Appropriate Use Criteria, 61% used segmental scoring, and 32% provided guidance on post-test therapeutic management. 89% perform catheterization correlations while only 33% implemented radiation dose tracking.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey of ASNC members provides critical information on nuclear cardiology practice to better target and service our members' needs. These data can prove invaluable to target educational needs and inform healthcare policy of contemporary nuclear cardiology practice.

摘要

背景

当今的影像实验室面临着包括报销、事先授权和认证标准在内的诸多挑战。其对美国核医学实践的影响尚不清楚。我们对 ASNC 成员进行了一项调查,以了解 2011 年核心脏病学影像实验室的情况。

方法和结果

该调查确定了包括人员、工作量、使用的方案以及实验室特征在内的实践模式。我们采用了地理上分层的随机抽样方法。应答率为 19.5%(73/374 个实验室)。2001 年对 25 个实验室进行的非随机调查作为对照。共有 73 个实验室,代表 202 名医生和 177 名技术员做出了回应。报告的中位数程序量为每年 1225 项研究;88.9%的实验室获得了认证。与 2001 年相比,双同位素成像方案的使用从 72%下降到 15.6%。调查了 5 个质量指标。一半的实验室使用美国心脏病学会的适当使用标准,61%使用节段评分,32%提供了关于测试后治疗管理的指导。89%进行导管插入术相关性检查,而只有 33%实施辐射剂量跟踪。

结论

这项对 ASNC 成员的调查为核心脏病学实践提供了关键信息,以便更好地满足我们成员的需求。这些数据对于确定教育需求和告知当代核心脏病学实践的医疗保健政策非常有价值。

相似文献

1
The evolving practice of nuclear cardiology: results from the 2011 ASNC member survey.核医学心脏学的发展实践:来自 2011 年 ASNC 成员调查的结果。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Dec;19(6):1170-5. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9624-8. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
2
ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization: American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions American Association for Thoracic Surgery American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Heart Failure Society of America Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Society of Thoracic Surgeons.ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012 诊断性导管插入术适用标准:美国心脏病学会基金会适当使用标准工作组,心血管血管造影和介入学会,美国胸外科学会,美国心脏协会,美国超声心动图学会,美国核医学学会,美国心力衰竭学会,心律学会,重症监护医学学会,心血管计算机断层扫描学会,心血管磁共振学会,胸外科医师学会。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep 1;80(3):E50-81. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24467. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
3
ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.美国心脏病学会基金会适宜性使用标准专家组、心血管造影和介入学会、美国胸外科学会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核医学学会、美国心力衰竭学会、心律学会、重症医学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、心血管磁共振学会以及胸外科医师学会 2012 年诊断性心导管术适宜性使用标准:美国心脏病学会基金会适宜性使用标准专家组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 May 29;59(22):1995-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 May 9.
4
ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 心脏计算机断层扫描适用标准。美国心脏病学会基金会适用标准特别工作组、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、美国放射学会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核医学学会、北美心血管成像学会、心血管血管造影和介入学会以及心血管磁共振学会的报告。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010 Nov-Dec;4(6):407.e1-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
5
ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 心脏计算机断层扫描适用标准。美国心脏病学会基金会适用标准特别工作组、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、美国放射学会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核医学学会、北美心血管成像学会、心血管血管造影和介入学会以及心血管磁共振学会的报告。
Circulation. 2010 Nov 23;122(21):e525-55. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181fcae66. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
6
ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 心脏计算机断层扫描适用标准。美国心脏病学会基金会适用标准特别工作组、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、美国放射学会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核医学学会、北美心血管成像学会、心血管血管造影和介入学会以及心血管磁共振学会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 23;56(22):1864-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.005.
7
ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Society of Thoracic Surgeons.ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012诊断性心导管插入术适用标准:美国心脏病学基金会适用标准工作组、心血管造影和介入学会、美国胸外科协会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核心脏病学会、美国心力衰竭学会、心律学会、危重病医学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、心血管磁共振学会、胸外科医师学会报告
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jul;144(1):39-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.04.013.
8
Northern exposure: nuclear cardiology in the Canadian health care system.北方视角:加拿大医疗保健系统中的核心脏病学
J Nucl Cardiol. 1995 Jan-Feb;2(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/s1071-3581(05)80008-x.
9
Nuclear cardiology practice and associated radiation doses in Europe: results of the IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Study (INCAPS) for the 27 European countries.欧洲的核心脏病学实践及相关辐射剂量:国际原子能机构核心脏病学协议研究(INCAPS)针对27个欧洲国家的研究结果。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Apr;43(4):718-28. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3270-8. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
10
Cardiovascular imaging practice in Europe: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.欧洲的心血管成像实践:来自欧洲心血管成像协会的一份报告。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jul;16(7):697-702. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev116. Epub 2015 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.定义心血管成像的质量:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Dec;10(12). doi: 10.1161/HCI.0000000000000017.
2
Myocardial perfusion imaging in women for the evaluation of stable ischemic heart disease-state-of-the-evidence and clinical recommendations.女性稳定型缺血性心脏病心肌灌注成像评估——证据现状与临床推荐。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Aug;24(4):1402-1426. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0926-8. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
3
Nuclear cardiology practice and associated radiation doses in Europe: results of the IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Study (INCAPS) for the 27 European countries.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association.《2012年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):e2-e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
2
Radiation risk from cardiac CT and nuclear cardiology: addressing concerns with innovative solutions.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2011 Aug;18(4):561. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9424-6.
3
The nuclear cardiology report: problems, predictors, and improvement. A report from the ICANL database.核医学报告:问题、预测因素和改进。来自 ICANL 数据库的报告。
欧洲的核心脏病学实践及相关辐射剂量:国际原子能机构核心脏病学协议研究(INCAPS)针对27个欧洲国家的研究结果。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Apr;43(4):718-28. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3270-8. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
4
Clinician-dependent variations in inappropriate use of myocardial perfusion imaging: training, specialty, and location.心肌灌注成像不恰当使用中因临床医生而异的差异:培训、专业及地点。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2014 Jun;21(3):598-604. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-9887-3. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
5
Use of myocardial perfusion imaging and estimation of associated radiation doses in Germany from 2005 to 2012.2005年至2012年德国心肌灌注成像的使用情况及相关辐射剂量估算
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 May;41(5):963-71. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2683-5. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2011 Oct;18(5):858-68. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9390-z. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
4
ACCF/AHA/HFSA 2011 survey results: current staffing profile of heart failure programs, including programs that perform heart transplant and mechanical circulatory support device implantation: a report of the ACCF Heart Failure and Transplant Committee, AHA Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee, and Heart Failure Society of America.美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/美国心力衰竭学会2011年调查结果:心力衰竭项目当前人员配置概况,包括开展心脏移植和植入机械循环支持装置的项目:美国心脏病学会基金会心力衰竭与移植委员会、美国心脏协会心力衰竭与移植委员会及美国心力衰竭学会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 May 17;57(20):2115-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
5
Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging.心肌灌注成像中减少辐射暴露的建议。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Aug;17(4):709-18. doi: 10.1007/s12350-010-9244-0.
6
Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results.年龄、性别、肥胖及糖尿病对选择性A2A激动剂瑞加诺生和腺苷在心肌灌注成像中的疗效及安全性的影响——整合ADVANCE-MPI试验结果
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 May;1(3):307-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.02.003.
7
The RegEx trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled pilot study combining regadenoson, a selective A(2A) adenosine agonist, with low-level exercise, in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.雷加迪松试验:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂和活性对照的试点研究,在接受心肌灌注成像的患者中,将选择性A(2A)腺苷激动剂雷加迪松与低强度运动相结合。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):63-72. doi: 10.1007/s12350-008-9001-9. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
8
Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare?冠状动脉疾病成像的辐射风险:不同诊断测试如何比较?
Heart. 2008 Dec;94(12):1519-21. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.135731.
9
Safety of regadenoson, a selective adenosine A2A agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RegCOPD trial).选择性腺苷A2A激动剂瑞加德松在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(RegCOPD试验)。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):319-28. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.02.013. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
10
Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial.心肌灌注成像中腺苷与瑞加腺苷的对比评估:ADVANCE 3期多中心国际试验结果
J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):645-58. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.114.