Turpin Merrill June, Rodger Sylvia, Hall Anna R
Division of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2012 Oct;59(5):367-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00988.x. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: An understanding of students' perceptions of occupational therapy on entry is required to recognise how professional socialisation occurs through curriculum. Findings pertain to a qualitative study investigating students' perceptions of occupational therapy upon entry to two occupational therapy programmes in Australia.
Students commencing Bachelor of Occupational Therapy and Masters of Occupational Therapy Studies programmes participated in the study (n = 462). A purpose-designed questionnaire was distributed to students in the first lecture of each programme. Preliminary analysis comprised identification of keywords/phrases and coding categories were generated from patterns of keywords. Frequency counts and percentages of keywords/phrases within categories were completed.
Students' responses were categorised as 'what' occupational therapists do; 'how' they do it; 'why' they do it; and 'who' they work with. In 'what' occupational therapists do students frequently described 'helping' people. Both undergraduate and graduate entry masters students used the term 'rehabilitation' to describe how occupational therapy is done, with graduate entry students occasionally responding with 'through occupation' and 'modifying the environment'. Students perceived the 'why' of occupational therapy as getting back to 'everyday activities', with some students emphasising returning to 'normal' activities or life. Regarding the 'who' category, students also thought occupational therapists worked with people with an 'injury' or 'disability'.
Students entered their occupational therapy programmes with perceptions consistent with the general public's views of occupational therapy. However, graduate entry students exposed to a pre-reading package prior to entry had more advanced occupational therapy concepts than undergraduate students.
背景/目的:需要了解学生入学时对职业治疗的看法,以认识专业社会化如何通过课程发生。研究结果来自一项定性研究,该研究调查了澳大利亚两个职业治疗项目的学生入学时对职业治疗的看法。
开始攻读职业治疗学士学位和职业治疗研究硕士学位课程的学生参与了该研究(n = 462)。在每个课程的第一堂课上向学生发放了一份专门设计的问卷。初步分析包括识别关键词/短语,并从关键词模式中生成编码类别。完成了类别内关键词/短语的频数统计和百分比统计。
学生的回答被归类为职业治疗师“做什么”;他们“如何”做;“为什么”做;以及与“谁”一起工作。在职业治疗师“做什么”方面,学生经常描述为“帮助”他人。本科入学和研究生入学的硕士生都使用“康复”一词来描述职业治疗的方式,研究生入学的学生偶尔会回答“通过职业”和“改变环境”。学生认为职业治疗的“目的”是回归“日常活动”,一些学生强调回归“正常”活动或生活。关于“与谁”这一类别,学生还认为职业治疗师与“受伤”或“残疾”的人一起工作。
学生进入职业治疗课程时的看法与公众对职业治疗的看法一致。然而,入学前接触过预读材料包的研究生入学学生比本科学生有更先进的职业治疗概念。