玻璃体腔内雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿:即刻与延迟激光治疗的 3 年随机试验结果。
Intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with prompt versus deferred laser treatment: three-year randomized trial results.
机构信息
Elman Retina Group, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
出版信息
Ophthalmology. 2012 Nov;119(11):2312-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.022. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
OBJECTIVE
To report the 3-year follow-up results within a previously reported randomized trial evaluating prompt versus deferred (for ≥24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment in eyes treated with intravitreal 0.5 mg ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME).
DESIGN
Multicenter, randomized clinical trial.
PARTICIPANTS
Three hundred sixty-one participants with visual acuity of 20/32 to 20/320 (approximate Snellen equivalent) and DME involving the fovea.
METHODS
Ranibizumab every 4 weeks until no longer improving (with resumption if worsening) and random assignment to prompt or deferred (≥24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Best-corrected visual acuity and safety at the 156-week (3-year) visit.
RESULTS
The estimated mean change in visual acuity letter score from baseline through the 3-year visit was 2.9 letters more (9.7 vs. 6.8 letters; mean difference, 2.9 letters; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-5.4 letters; P = 0.02) in the deferral group compared with the prompt laser treatment group. In the prompt laser treatment group and deferral group, respectively, the percentage of eyes with a ≥10-letter gain/loss was 42% and 56% (P = 0.02), whereas the respective percentage of eyes with a ≥10-letter gain/loss was 10% and 5% (P = 0.12). Up to the 3-year visit, the median numbers of injections were 12 and 15 in the prompt and deferral groups, respectively (P = 0.007), including 1 and 2 injections, respectively, from the 2-year up to the 3-year visit. At the 3-year visit, the percentages of eyes with central subfield thickness of 250 μm or more on time-domain optical coherence tomography were 36% in both groups (P = 0.90). In the deferral group, 54% did not receive laser treatment during the trial. Systemic adverse events seemed to be similar in the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS
These 3-year results suggest that focal/grid laser treatment at the initiation of intravitreal ranibizumab is no better, and possibly worse, for vision outcomes than deferring laser treatment for 24 weeks or more in eyes with DME involving the fovea and with vision impairment. Some of the observed differences in visual acuity at 3 years may be related to fewer cumulative ranibizumab injections during follow-up in the prompt laser treatment group. Follow-up through 5 years continues.
目的
报告先前报道的一项随机试验的 3 年随访结果,该试验评估了在接受玻璃体腔 0.5mg 雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)的患者中,即刻与延迟(≥24 周)行局部/格栅激光治疗对视力的影响。
设计
多中心随机临床试验。
参与者
361 名视力为 20/32 至 20/320(近似 Snellen 等价物)且黄斑中心凹受累的 DME 患者。
方法
雷珠单抗每 4 周治疗一次,直至视力不再提高(如有恶化则恢复治疗),并随机分为即刻治疗组和延迟治疗组(≥24 周)。
主要观察指标
第 156 周(3 年)时的最佳矫正视力和安全性。
结果
从基线到 3 年随访时,延迟治疗组的视力平均提高 2.9 个字母(9.7 比 6.8 个字母;平均差异,2.9 个字母;95%置信区间,0.4-5.4 个字母;P=0.02),优于即刻激光治疗组。即刻激光治疗组和延迟治疗组的分别有 42%和 56%(P=0.02)的眼获得≥10 个字母的视力改善/丧失,而相应的获得≥10 个字母的视力改善/丧失的比例分别为 10%和 5%(P=0.12)。截至 3 年随访时,即刻激光治疗组和延迟治疗组的中位数注射次数分别为 12 次和 15 次(P=0.007),其中 1 年至 3 年随访期间分别各注射了 1 次和 2 次。在 3 年随访时,两组的中心视网膜厚度均有 36%(P=0.90)的患者达到 250μm或以上。在延迟治疗组,54%的患者在试验期间未接受激光治疗。两组的全身不良事件似乎相似。
结论
这些 3 年的结果表明,对于黄斑中心凹受累且视力受损的 DME 患者,与延迟治疗 24 周或更长时间相比,即刻行局部/格栅激光治疗在视力结果方面并没有更好的效果,甚至可能更差。在 3 年时观察到的一些视力差异可能与即刻激光治疗组在随访期间接受的累积雷珠单抗注射次数较少有关。随访将继续进行 5 年。