Bressler Susan B, Glassman Adam R, Almukhtar Talat, Bressler Neil M, Ferris Frederick L, Googe Joseph M, Gupta Shailesh K, Jampol Lee M, Melia Michele, Wells John A
Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Inc, Tampa, Florida.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;164:57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.12.025. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
To compare long-term vision and anatomic effects of ranibizumab with prompt or deferred laser vs laser or triamcinolone + laser with very deferred ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema (DME).
Randomized clinical trial.
Eight hundred and twenty-eight study eyes (558 [67%] completed the 5-year visit), at 52 sites, with visual acuity 20/32 to 20/320 and DME involving the central macula were randomly assigned to intravitreous ranibizumab (0.5 mg) with either (1) prompt or (2) deferred laser; (3) sham injection + prompt laser; or (4) intravitreous triamcinolone (4 mg) + prompt laser. The latter 2 groups could initiate ranibizumab as early as 74 weeks from baseline, for persistent DME with vision impairment. The main outcome measures were visual acuity, optical coherence central subfield thickness, and number of injections through 5 years.
At 5 years mean (± standard deviation) change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity letter scores from baseline in the ranibizumab + deferred laser (N = 111), ranibizumab + prompt laser (N = 124), laser/very deferred ranibizumab (N = 198), and triamcinolone + laser/very deferred ranibizumab (N = 125) groups were 10 ± 13, 8 ± 13, 5 ± 14, and 7 ± 14, respectively. The difference (95% confidence interval) in mean change between ranibizumab + deferred laser and laser/very deferred ranibizumab and triamcinolone + laser/very deferred ranibizumab was 4.4 (1.2-7.6, P = .001) and 2.8 (-0.9 to 6.5, P = .067), respectively, at 5 years.
Recognizing limitations of follow-up available at 5 years, eyes receiving initial ranibizumab therapy for center-involving DME likely have better long-term vision improvements than eyes managed with laser or triamcinolone + laser followed by very deferred ranibizumab for persistent thickening and vision impairment.
比较雷珠单抗联合即刻或延迟激光治疗与激光或曲安奈德+激光联合极延迟雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的长期视力和解剖学效果。
随机临床试验。
52个研究地点的828只研究眼(558只[67%]完成了5年随访),视力为20/32至20/320且DME累及黄斑中心,被随机分配接受玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗(0.5mg),并联合以下治疗之一:(1)即刻激光;(2)延迟激光;(3)假注射+即刻激光;或(4)玻璃体内注射曲安奈德(4mg)+即刻激光。后两组在基线后74周时,若出现持续性DME伴视力损害,可尽早开始使用雷珠单抗。主要观察指标为视力、光学相干断层扫描中心子野厚度以及5年内的注射次数。
5年后,雷珠单抗+延迟激光组(N = 111)、雷珠单抗+即刻激光组(N = 124)、激光/极延迟雷珠单抗组(N = 198)和曲安奈德+激光/极延迟雷珠单抗组(N = 125)的早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究视力字母评分相对于基线的平均(±标准差)变化分别为10±13、8±13、5±14和7±14。5年后,雷珠单抗+延迟激光组与激光/极延迟雷珠单抗组以及曲安奈德+激光/极延迟雷珠单抗组的平均变化差异(95%置信区间)分别为4.4(1.2 - 7.6,P = 0.001)和2.8(-0.9至6.5,P = 0.067)。
认识到5年随访存在的局限性,对于累及黄斑中心的DME,接受初始雷珠单抗治疗的眼睛可能比先接受激光或曲安奈德+激光治疗,然后在出现持续性增厚和视力损害时极延迟使用雷珠单抗治疗的眼睛具有更好的长期视力改善。