• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一种包含等位基因缺失和嵌合的 DNA 混合物统计工具。

Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.

机构信息

Department of Forensic Biology, Office of Chief Medical Examiner of The City of New York, 421 E 26th Street, New York, NY 10016, United States.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Dec;6(6):749-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.08.007
PMID:22999739
Abstract

DNA mixture analysis is a current topic of discussion in the forensics literature. Of particular interest is how to approach mixtures where allelic drop-out and/or drop-in may have occurred. The Office of Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) of The City of New York has developed and validated the Forensic Statistical Tool (FST), a software tool for likelihood ratio analysis of forensic DNA samples, allowing for allelic drop-out and drop-in. FST can be used for single source samples and for mixtures of DNA from two or three contributors, with or without known contributors. Drop-out and drop-in probabilities were estimated empirically through analysis of over 2000 amplifications of more than 700 mixtures and single source samples. Drop-out rates used by FST are a function of the Identifiler(®) locus, the quantity of template DNA amplified, the number of amplification cycles, the number of contributors to the sample, and the approximate mixture ratio (either unequal or approximately equal). Drop-out rates were estimated separately for heterozygous and homozygous genotypes. Drop-in rates used by FST are a function of number of amplification cycles only. FST was validated using 454 mock evidence samples generated from DNA mixtures and from items handled by one to four persons. For each sample, likelihood ratios (LRs) were computed for each true contributor and for each profile in a database of over 1200 non-contributors. A wide range of LRs for true contributors was obtained, as true contributors' alleles may be labeled at some or all of the tested loci. However, the LRs were consistent with OCME's qualitative assessments of the results. The second set of data was used to evaluate FST LR results when the test sample in the prosecution hypothesis of the LR is not a contributor to the mixture. With this validation, we demonstrate that LRs generated using FST are consistent with, but more informative than, OCME's qualitative sample assessments and that LRs for non-contributors are appropriately assigned.

摘要

DNA 混合分析是法医学文献中的一个当前讨论话题。特别感兴趣的是如何处理可能发生等位基因缺失和/或掺入的混合物。纽约市首席法医办公室 (OCME) 开发并验证了法医统计工具 (FST),这是一种用于法医 DNA 样本似然比分析的软件工具,允许存在等位基因缺失和掺入。FST 可用于单源样本和来自两个或三个供体的 DNA 混合物,无论供体是否已知。通过对超过 700 个混合物和单源样本的 2000 多次扩增的分析,经验估计了缺失和掺入的概率。FST 使用的缺失率是 Identifiler(®) 基因座、扩增的模板 DNA 量、扩增循环数、样品中供体的数量以及近似混合物比例(不相等或近似相等)的函数。缺失率分别针对杂合子和纯合子基因型进行估计。FST 使用的掺入率仅与扩增循环数有关。使用来自 DNA 混合物和由一到四人处理的物品生成的 454 个模拟证据样本对 FST 进行了验证。对于每个样本,为每个真实供体和数据库中的每个图谱计算了似然比 (LR)。对于真实供体获得了广泛的 LR 值,因为真实供体的等位基因可能在某些或所有测试基因座上被标记。然而,LR 与 OCME 对结果的定性评估一致。第二组数据用于评估 LR 中测试样本不是混合物供体时 FST LR 结果。通过这种验证,我们证明使用 FST 生成的 LR 与 OCME 的定性样本评估一致,但更具信息量,并且非供体的 LR 被适当地分配。

相似文献

1
Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.验证一种包含等位基因缺失和嵌合的 DNA 混合物统计工具。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Dec;6(6):749-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
2
An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.对源于复杂混合物的似然比的信息含量的评估。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 May;22:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
3
Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.用于解释低模板 DNA 混合物的探索性数据分析。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Dec;6(6):762-74. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
4
Analysis of allelic drop-out using the Identifiler(®) and PowerPlex(®) 16 forensic STR typing systems.利用 Identifiler(®) 和 PowerPlex(®) 16 法医 STR 分型系统进行等位基因缺失分析。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Sep;12:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
5
Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.基于定量连续模型的 DNA 混合物解释开源软件的开发与验证。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 17;12(11):e0188183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188183. eCollection 2017.
6
Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.对 DNA 混合物来源个体数目的推断:贝叶斯网络方法与最大等位基因计数法的比较分析。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Dec;6(6):689-96. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
7
Assessment of mock cases involving complex low template DNA mixtures: A descriptive study.评估涉及复杂低模板 DNA 混合物的模拟案例:描述性研究。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Dec;6(6):697-707. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 May 19.
8
Mixture interpretation: Experimental and simulated reevaluation of qualitative analysis.混合解释:定性分析的实验与模拟重新评估
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2013 Mar;15(2):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
9
Comparison of different interpretation strategies for low template DNA mixtures.不同低模板 DNA 混合物解释策略的比较。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Dec;6(6):716-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
10
TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.对包含多达五个未知贡献者的DNA混合物进行TrueAllele(®) 基因型鉴定。
J Forensic Sci. 2015 Jul;60(4):857-68. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12788. Epub 2015 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of parameter variation in the quantification of forensic genetic evidence.参数变化对法医遗传学证据量化的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):2524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83841-2.
2
Advancements in differentiation between sperm cells and epithelial cells for efficient forensic DNA analysis in sexual assault cases.在性侵案件中,为了进行高效的法医 DNA 分析,在区分精子细胞和上皮细胞方面的进展。
Int J Legal Med. 2024 Nov;138(6):2209-2227. doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03285-1. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
3
Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.
国际刑警组织对2016 - 2019年法医生物学和法医DNA分型的审查
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Feb 20;2:352-367. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.12.002. eCollection 2020.
4
Estimation of the number of contributors to mixed samples of DNA by mitochondrial DNA analyses using massively parallel sequencing.通过大规模平行测序的线粒体DNA分析来估计DNA混合样本中的贡献者数量。
Int J Legal Med. 2020 Jan;134(1):101-109. doi: 10.1007/s00414-019-02182-2. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
5
Validating TrueAllele Interpretation of DNA Mixtures Containing up to Ten Unknown Contributors.验证包含多达十名未知贡献者的DNA混合样本的TrueAllele解释
J Forensic Sci. 2020 Mar;65(2):380-398. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14204. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
6
Efficient construction of match strength distributions for uncertain multi-locus genotypes.不确定多位点基因型匹配强度分布的高效构建。
Heliyon. 2018 Oct 8;4(10):e00824. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00824. eCollection 2018 Oct.
7
Characterization of degradation and heterozygote balance by simulation of the forensic DNA analysis process.通过法医DNA分析过程模拟对降解和杂合子平衡进行表征。
Int J Legal Med. 2017 Mar;131(2):303-317. doi: 10.1007/s00414-016-1453-x. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
8
Low-template DNA: A single DNA analysis or two replicates?低模板DNA:单次DNA分析还是两次重复分析?
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Jul;264:139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
9
Modeling one complete versus triplicate analyses in low template DNA typing.低模板DNA分型中单次完整分析与三次重复分析的建模
Int J Legal Med. 2014 Mar;128(2):259-67. doi: 10.1007/s00414-013-0924-6. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
10
Evaluation of mixed-source, low-template DNA profiles in forensic science.法庭科学中混合来源、低模板 DNA 谱的评估。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 23;110(30):12241-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219739110. Epub 2013 Jul 1.