Boxer Paul, Sloan-Power Elizabeth, Schappell Ignacio Mercado And Ashley
Department of Psychology, Rutgers University.
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2012 Sep 1;34(3):405-414. doi: 10.1007/s10862-012-9285-6. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
Coping reactions to stressful events are important links between difficult experiences and the emergence of psychopathology. In this study we compared youths' negative coping with stress in general to their negative coping with violence in particular, and utilized a person-centered analytic approach to examine how patterns of coping relate to various mental health outcomes. We utilized survey interview measures to collect data from a sample of 131 youth (ages 11-14, 100% ethnic minority) residing in an economically distressed metropolitan area of the northeast. We observed significant relations between youths' tendencies to cope with stress and violence via externalized-internalized strategies (e.g., yelling to let off steam, crying) and their mental health symptoms. However, we generally did not observe relations between engagement in distancing coping strategies (e.g., making believe nothing happened) and any problematic outcomes. Negative coping does not appear be a monolithic construct uniformly associated with negative outcomes for youth. Distancing coping might represent an especially useful short-term coping response for youth living in socioeconomically distressed conditions from the standpoint of inhibiting symptom development.
应对压力事件的反应是困难经历与精神病理学出现之间的重要联系。在本研究中,我们将青少年一般的消极应对压力方式与他们对暴力的消极应对方式进行了比较,并采用以人为主的分析方法来研究应对模式与各种心理健康结果之间的关系。我们利用调查访谈措施,从居住在东北部一个经济贫困大都市地区的131名青少年(年龄在11 - 14岁,100%为少数民族)样本中收集数据。我们观察到青少年通过外化 - 内化策略(如大喊以发泄情绪、哭泣)应对压力和暴力的倾向与他们的心理健康症状之间存在显著关系。然而,我们一般未观察到采用疏离应对策略(如假装什么都没发生)与任何问题结果之间的关系。消极应对似乎并非一个与青少年消极结果统一相关的单一结构。从抑制症状发展的角度来看,疏离应对可能是生活在社会经济困境中的青少年一种特别有用的短期应对反应。