Elyasi Zarringhabaie Ghorban, Javanmard Arash, Pirahary Ommolbanin
Department of Animal Science, East Azarbaijan Research Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tabriz, Iran.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:640381. doi: 10.1100/2012/640381. Epub 2012 May 2.
The objective of present study was identification of genetic similarity between wild Iran and captive Azerbaijan Pheasant using PCR-RAPD markers. For this purpose, in overall, 28 birds were taken for DNA extraction and subsequently 15 arbitrary primers were applied for PCR-RAPD technique. After electrophoresis, five primers exhibited sufficient variability which yielded overall 65 distinct bands, 59 polymorphic bands, for detalis, range of number of bands per primer was 10 to 14, and produced size varied between 200 to 1500 bp. Highest and lowest polymorphic primers were OPC5, OPC16 (100%) and OPC15 (81%), respectively. Result of genetic variation between two groups was accounted as nonsignificant (8.12%) of the overall variation. According to our expectation the wild Iranian birds showed higher genetic diversity value than the Azerbaijan captive birds. As general conclusion, two pheasant populations have almost same genetic origin and probably are subpopulations of one population. The data reported herein could open the opportunity to search for suitable conservation strategy to improve richness of Iran biodiversity and present study here was the first report that might have significant impact on the breeding and conservation program of Iranian pheasant gene pool. Analyses using more regions, more birds, and more DNA markers will be useful to confirm or to reject these findings.
本研究的目的是利用PCR-RAPD标记鉴定伊朗野生雉鸡和阿塞拜疆圈养雉鸡之间的遗传相似性。为此,总共选取了28只鸟进行DNA提取,随后使用15条随机引物进行PCR-RAPD技术。电泳后,五条引物表现出足够的变异性,共产生65条清晰的条带,其中59条为多态性条带,具体而言,每条引物的条带数量范围为10至14条,产生的片段大小在200至1500bp之间。多态性最高和最低的引物分别是OPC5、OPC16(100%)和OPC15(81%)。两组之间的遗传变异结果被认为在总体变异中不显著(8.12%)。正如我们所预期的,伊朗野生鸟类的遗传多样性值高于阿塞拜疆圈养鸟类。总的来说,两个雉鸡种群几乎有相同的遗传起源,可能是一个种群的亚种群。本文报道的数据可能为寻找合适的保护策略以提高伊朗生物多样性丰富度提供机会,本研究是第一份可能对伊朗雉鸡基因库的育种和保护计划产生重大影响报告。使用更多区域、更多鸟类和更多DNA标记进行分析将有助于证实或否定这些发现。