Suppr超能文献

精神药理学家会与心理治疗师交流吗?一项针对执业临床医生的调查。

Do psychopharmacologists speak to psychotherapists? A survey of practicing clinicians.

作者信息

Kalman Thomas P, Kalman Victoria N, Granet Roger

机构信息

Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;40(2):275-85. doi: 10.1521/pdps.2012.40.2.275.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Split-treatment, the provision of psychotherapy and psychotropic medication by two different professionals, has become prevalent in U.S. mental health care delivery, as more Americans receive prescriptions and American psychiatrists provide less psychotherapy. Historically, communication between professionals treating the same patient has been an accepted principle of optimal care, but there has been only one formal assessment (Avena & Kalman, 2010a,b) of whether or not such communication actually takes place in the private sector. This article supplements the aforementioned survey of psychotherapists with a survey of psychiatrists.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

An eight-item survey was mailed to 150 full-time private practice psychiatrists in Manhattan and New Jersey. Questionnaires were completed anonymously and returned by mail. Data was gathered about years of practice experience, how many patients were seen in the prior month, and how many patients were also in psychotherapy with another professional. Frequency of communication with psychotherapists on behalf of these patients and for patients in treatment for six months or longer was also assessed. Lastly, information was compiled on which professional more frequently initiated the communication when it did occur.

RESULTS

Sixty-one psychiatrists, averaging 26.7 years in practice, returned surveys. For all respondents, the total number of medication-only patients seen in the last full month was 1903, of which 785 (41.25%) were in psychotherapy with another mental health professional. Respondents reported a total of 875 split-care patients in treatment for six months or longer, with no communication with the psychotherapist being reported on behalf of 24% of these individuals. Respondents indicated that they had initiated 68.4% of the most recent contacts with the other professional, and just 10 of 55 (18.2%) responding psychiatrists reported quarterly communication with their split-care patients' psychotherapists for all shared patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that split-care treatment is common but that adequate communication between professionals engaged in such treatment frequently does not take place. Corroborating the findings of the earlier survey, many questions remain about the need for guidelines regarding the conduct of split-treatment and about how best to determine the importance of communication between professionals engaged in this therapeutic arrangement.

摘要

背景

分治治疗,即由两名不同专业人员分别提供心理治疗和精神药物治疗,在美国心理健康护理服务中已变得普遍,因为越来越多的美国人接受处方治疗,而美国精神科医生提供的心理治疗却越来越少。从历史上看,治疗同一名患者的专业人员之间的沟通一直是最佳护理的公认原则,但对于这种沟通在私营部门是否实际发生,仅有一项正式评估(阿韦纳和卡尔曼,2010年a、b)。本文通过对精神科医生的调查对上述心理治疗师调查进行补充。

对象与方法

向曼哈顿和新泽西州的150名全职私人执业精神科医生邮寄了一份包含八个项目的调查问卷。问卷以匿名方式填写并通过邮件返还。收集了有关执业年限、前一个月看诊患者数量以及同时还在接受另一名专业人员心理治疗的患者数量的数据。还评估了代表这些患者以及治疗六个月或更长时间的患者与心理治疗师沟通的频率。最后,汇编了关于沟通发生时哪个专业人员更频繁发起沟通的信息。

结果

61名平均执业26.7年的精神科医生返还了调查问卷。对于所有受访者,上一个完整月份仅接受药物治疗的患者总数为1903人,其中785人(41.25%)同时在接受另一名心理健康专业人员的心理治疗。受访者报告共有875名分治护理患者接受治疗六个月或更长时间,其中24%的患者未报告与心理治疗师有沟通。受访者表示,他们发起了与另一名专业人员最近接触的68.4%,在55名回复的精神科医生中,只有10人(18.2%)报告为所有共享患者与他们的分治护理患者的心理治疗师进行季度沟通。

结论

我们发现分治护理治疗很常见,但参与此类治疗的专业人员之间经常没有进行充分沟通。与早期调查结果一致,关于分治治疗行为的指导方针的必要性以及如何最好地确定参与这种治疗安排的专业人员之间沟通的重要性,仍有许多问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验