Turchiano Michael, Sweat Victoria, Fierman Arthur, Convit Antonio
Departments of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Nov;166(11):1030-6. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1263.
To determine the point prevalences of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components among healthy weight, overweight, and obese inner-city public high school students, to compare the prevalences of MetS when using 2 different definitions (one with the impaired fasting glucose [IFG] level and the other with a homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR] of 3.99 or higher to define the glucose regulation component), and to compare the degree to which HOMA-IR and fasting glucose level are associated with the other MetS components.
Cross-sectional analysis.
Two New York City public high schools, from April 2008 through August 2011.
Convenience sample of 1185 high school youth, comprising predominantly Hispanic and African American students from low-income households, participating in The Banishing Obesity and Diabetes in Youth Project, a medical screening and education program.
Prevalences of the following individual MetS components: IFG threshold, HOMA-IR, hypertension, central adiposity, hypertriglyceridemia, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Rates of MetSIFG and MetSHOMA-IR were also assessed.
MetSIFG and MetSHOMA-IR point prevalences were both 0.3% in the healthy weight group; they were 2.6% and 5.9%, respectively, in the overweight group and were 22.9% and 35.1%, respectively, in the obese group (P < .05 for both). An IFG threshold of 100 mg/dL or higher was found in 1.0% of participants, whereas a HOMA-IR of 3.99 or higher was found in 19.5% of participants.
An elevated HOMA-IR is much more sensitive than an IFG threshold in identifying adolescents with metabolic dysregulation. Using a HOMA-IR threshold of 3.99 identifies more youth with MetS than using an IFG threshold of 100 mg/dL. In addition to increasing the sensitivity of MetS detection, HOMA-IR has a much higher association with the other MetS components than the IFG threshold and may better reflect a unified underlying pathologic process useful to identify youth at risk for disease.
确定健康体重、超重和肥胖的市中心公立高中学生中代谢综合征(MetS)及其各组分的时点患病率,比较使用两种不同定义(一种采用空腹血糖受损[IFG]水平,另一种采用胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估[HOMA-IR]≥3.99来定义血糖调节组分)时MetS的患病率,并比较HOMA-IR和空腹血糖水平与其他MetS组分的关联程度。
横断面分析。
2008年4月至2011年8月期间的两所纽约市公立高中。
1185名高中青年的便利样本,主要包括来自低收入家庭的西班牙裔和非裔美国学生,参与“消除青少年肥胖与糖尿病项目”,这是一项医学筛查和教育项目。
以下各MetS组分的患病率:IFG阈值、HOMA-IR、高血压、中心性肥胖、高甘油三酯血症和低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇。还评估了MetSIFG和MetSHOMA-IR的发生率。
健康体重组中MetSIFG和MetSHOMA-IR的时点患病率均为0.3%;超重组中分别为2.6%和5.9%,肥胖组中分别为22.9%和35.1%(两者P均<0.05)。1.0%的参与者IFG阈值≥100mg/dL,而19.5%的参与者HOMA-IR≥3.99。
在识别代谢失调的青少年方面,升高的HOMA-IR比IFG阈值敏感得多。使用HOMA-IR阈值3.99比使用IFG阈值100mg/dL能识别出更多患有MetS的青年。除了提高MetS检测的敏感性外,HOMA-IR与其他MetS组分的关联比IFG阈值高得多,可能能更好地反映一个统一的潜在病理过程,有助于识别有疾病风险的青年。