Goss Donald L, Gross Michael T
US Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA.
US Army Med Dep J. 2012 Oct-Dec:25-30.
Some runners are experimenting with barefoot or minimalist shoe running to reduce lower extremity overuse injuries. However, there has been little research to examine injury trends associated with barefoot or minimalist shoe running.
To assess the association of self-reported shoe selection with reported foot strike patterns, compare overall injury incidence associated with different shoe conditions, and identify differences in injury location between different shoe conditions.
Retrospective descriptive epidemiology survey.
We recruited 2,509 runners (1,254 male, 1,255 female) aged 18 to 50 to complete an anonymous online survey. The survey assessed running tendencies, footstrike patterns, shoe preferences, and injury history. Reported footstrike patterns were compared among 3 shoe groups: traditionally shod, minimalist shoes, and barefoot runners. Overall and specific anatomical injury incidence was compared between traditionally shod and minimalist shoe-wearing runners. We did not include 1,605 runners in the analyses due to incomplete data or recent changes in footstrike patterns and/or shoe selection.
Shoe selection was significantly associated with reported footstrike (χ² (4df) =143.4, P<.001). Barefoot and minimalist runners reported a more anterior footstrike than traditionally shod runners. Traditionally shod runners were 3.41 times more likely to report injuries than experienced minimalist shoe wearers (46.7% shod vs 13.7% minimalist, χ² (1df) =77.4, P<.001, n=888). Minimalist shoe wearers also reported fewer injuries at the hip, knee, lower leg, ankle, and foot than traditionally shod runners.
Barefoot and minimalist shoe wearers reported a more anterior footstrike than traditionally shod runners. Traditionally shod runners were more likely to report injuries of the lower extremities than runners who wear minimalist shoes. Additional longitudinal prospective research is required to examine injury incidence among various footstrike patterns and shoe preferences.
一些跑步者正在尝试赤脚或穿极简主义跑鞋跑步,以减少下肢过度使用损伤。然而,很少有研究来调查与赤脚或穿极简主义跑鞋跑步相关的损伤趋势。
评估自我报告的鞋子选择与报告的着地方式之间的关联,比较不同鞋子条件下的总体损伤发生率,并确定不同鞋子条件下损伤部位的差异。
回顾性描述性流行病学调查。
我们招募了2509名年龄在18至50岁之间的跑步者(1254名男性,1255名女性)来完成一项匿名在线调查。该调查评估了跑步倾向、着地方式、鞋子偏好和损伤史。在三个鞋子组中比较报告的着地方式:传统穿鞋者、穿极简主义跑鞋者和赤脚跑步者。比较传统穿鞋跑步者和穿极简主义跑鞋跑步者的总体和特定解剖部位的损伤发生率。由于数据不完整或着地方式和/或鞋子选择的近期变化,我们在分析中未纳入1605名跑步者。
鞋子选择与报告的着地方式显著相关(χ²(4自由度)=143.4,P<.001)。赤脚和穿极简主义跑鞋的跑步者报告的着地位置比传统穿鞋的跑步者更靠前。传统穿鞋的跑步者报告受伤的可能性是有经验的穿极简主义跑鞋者的3.41倍(46.7%穿鞋者 vs 13.7%穿极简主义跑鞋者,χ²(1自由度)=77.4,P<.001,n=888)。穿极简主义跑鞋者报告的髋部、膝盖、小腿、脚踝和足部损伤也比传统穿鞋者少。
赤脚和穿极简主义跑鞋的跑步者报告的着地位置比传统穿鞋的跑步者更靠前。传统穿鞋的跑步者比穿极简主义跑鞋的跑步者更有可能报告下肢损伤。需要更多纵向前瞻性研究来检查各种着地方式和鞋子偏好中的损伤发生率。