Suppr超能文献

改善老年虚弱的一项初步随机对照试验。

A pilot randomized controlled trial to improve geriatric frailty.

机构信息

Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, 35 Keyan Road, Zhunan, Miaoli County, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2012 Sep 25;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-58.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) report interventions targeting improvement of frailty status as an outcome.

METHODS

This RCT enrolled 117 older adults (65-79 years of age) in Toufen, Taiwan who scored 3-6 on The Chinese Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale Telephone Version and then score ≥1 on the Cardiovascular Health Study Phenotypic Classification of Frailty (CHS_PCF). With a two by two factorial design, subjects were randomly assigned to interventions (Exercise and nutrition, EN, n = 55 or problem solving therapy, PST, n = 57) or controls (non-EN, n = 62 or non-PST, n = 60). Educational booklets were provided to all. EN group subjects received nutrition consultation and a thrice-weekly exercise-training program while PST group subjects received 6 sessions in 3 month. Subjects were followed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary outcome was improvement of the CHS_PCF by at least one category (from pre-frail to robust, or from frail to pre-frail or robust) from baseline assessments. One hundred and one completed final assessments. Intention-to-treat analysis with the generalized estimating equation model was applied with adjustment for time and treatment-by-time interactions.

RESULTS

Mean age was 71.4 ± 3.7 years, with 59% females. Baseline characteristic were generally comparable between groups. EN group subjects had a higher improvement rate on the primary outcome than non-EN group subjects (45% vs 27%, adjusted p = 0.008) at 3 months, but not 6 or 12 months. They also had more increase of serum 25(OH) vitamin D level (4.9 ± 7.7 vs 1.2 ± 5.4, p = 0.006) and lower percentage of osteopenia (74% vs 89% p = 0.042) at 12 months. PST group subjects had better improvement (2.7 ± 6.1 vs 0.2 ± 6.7, p = 0.035, 6-month) and less deterioration (-3.5 ± 9.7 vs -7.1 ± 8.7, p = 0.036, 12-month) of dominant leg extension power than non-PST subjects. Some secondary outcomes were also improved in control groups (non-EN or non-PST). No adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The three-month EN intervention resulted in short-term (3-month) frailty status improvement and long-term effect on bone mineral density and serum vitamin D (12-month) among Taiwanese community-dwelling elders. The effect of PST was less pronounced.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: EC0970301

摘要

背景

很少有随机对照试验 (RCT) 报告以改善虚弱状态为结局的干预措施。

方法

这项 RCT 纳入了台湾头份市的 117 名年龄在 65-79 岁之间的老年人(中华加美健康老龄化研究临床虚弱量表电话版评分为 3-6 分,心血管健康研究虚弱表型分类评分为 ≥1 分)。采用 2×2 析因设计,将受试者随机分为干预组(运动和营养,EN,n=55 或问题解决疗法,PST,n=57)或对照组(非 EN,n=62 或非 PST,n=60)。所有受试者均提供教育手册。EN 组受试者接受营养咨询和每周三次的运动训练计划,而 PST 组受试者则在 3 个月内接受 6 次治疗。在 3、6 和 12 个月时对受试者进行随访。主要结局是从基线评估开始,CHS_PCF 至少改善一个类别(从虚弱前到健壮,或从虚弱到虚弱前或健壮)。101 名完成了最终评估。采用广义估计方程模型进行意向治疗分析,并对时间和治疗与时间的交互作用进行调整。

结果

平均年龄为 71.4±3.7 岁,女性占 59%。基线特征在各组间一般相似。EN 组受试者在 3 个月时比非 EN 组受试者(45% vs 27%,调整后 p=0.008)的主要结局改善率更高,但在 6 个月或 12 个月时无差异。12 个月时,EN 组血清 25(OH)维生素 D 水平也有更大的升高(4.9±7.7 vs 1.2±5.4,p=0.006),骨密度降低的比例更低(74% vs 89%,p=0.042)。PST 组受试者在优势腿伸肌力量方面的改善(2.7±6.1 vs 0.2±6.7,p=0.035,6 个月)和恶化程度(-3.5±9.7 vs -7.1±8.7,p=0.036,12 个月)均优于非 PST 组。对照组(非 EN 或非 PST)的一些次要结局也有所改善。未报告不良事件。

结论

在台湾社区居住的老年人中,EN 干预措施在 3 个月时可改善虚弱状态,并在 12 个月时对骨密度和血清维生素 D 产生长期影响,但 PST 的效果不那么显著。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:EC0970301

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8f/3490887/f37b50cb3e09/1471-2318-12-58-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验