Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, 35 Keyan Road, Zhunan, Miaoli County, Taiwan.
BMC Geriatr. 2012 Sep 25;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-58.
Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) report interventions targeting improvement of frailty status as an outcome.
This RCT enrolled 117 older adults (65-79 years of age) in Toufen, Taiwan who scored 3-6 on The Chinese Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale Telephone Version and then score ≥1 on the Cardiovascular Health Study Phenotypic Classification of Frailty (CHS_PCF). With a two by two factorial design, subjects were randomly assigned to interventions (Exercise and nutrition, EN, n = 55 or problem solving therapy, PST, n = 57) or controls (non-EN, n = 62 or non-PST, n = 60). Educational booklets were provided to all. EN group subjects received nutrition consultation and a thrice-weekly exercise-training program while PST group subjects received 6 sessions in 3 month. Subjects were followed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary outcome was improvement of the CHS_PCF by at least one category (from pre-frail to robust, or from frail to pre-frail or robust) from baseline assessments. One hundred and one completed final assessments. Intention-to-treat analysis with the generalized estimating equation model was applied with adjustment for time and treatment-by-time interactions.
Mean age was 71.4 ± 3.7 years, with 59% females. Baseline characteristic were generally comparable between groups. EN group subjects had a higher improvement rate on the primary outcome than non-EN group subjects (45% vs 27%, adjusted p = 0.008) at 3 months, but not 6 or 12 months. They also had more increase of serum 25(OH) vitamin D level (4.9 ± 7.7 vs 1.2 ± 5.4, p = 0.006) and lower percentage of osteopenia (74% vs 89% p = 0.042) at 12 months. PST group subjects had better improvement (2.7 ± 6.1 vs 0.2 ± 6.7, p = 0.035, 6-month) and less deterioration (-3.5 ± 9.7 vs -7.1 ± 8.7, p = 0.036, 12-month) of dominant leg extension power than non-PST subjects. Some secondary outcomes were also improved in control groups (non-EN or non-PST). No adverse effects were reported.
The three-month EN intervention resulted in short-term (3-month) frailty status improvement and long-term effect on bone mineral density and serum vitamin D (12-month) among Taiwanese community-dwelling elders. The effect of PST was less pronounced.
ClinicalTrials.gov: EC0970301
很少有随机对照试验 (RCT) 报告以改善虚弱状态为结局的干预措施。
这项 RCT 纳入了台湾头份市的 117 名年龄在 65-79 岁之间的老年人(中华加美健康老龄化研究临床虚弱量表电话版评分为 3-6 分,心血管健康研究虚弱表型分类评分为 ≥1 分)。采用 2×2 析因设计,将受试者随机分为干预组(运动和营养,EN,n=55 或问题解决疗法,PST,n=57)或对照组(非 EN,n=62 或非 PST,n=60)。所有受试者均提供教育手册。EN 组受试者接受营养咨询和每周三次的运动训练计划,而 PST 组受试者则在 3 个月内接受 6 次治疗。在 3、6 和 12 个月时对受试者进行随访。主要结局是从基线评估开始,CHS_PCF 至少改善一个类别(从虚弱前到健壮,或从虚弱到虚弱前或健壮)。101 名完成了最终评估。采用广义估计方程模型进行意向治疗分析,并对时间和治疗与时间的交互作用进行调整。
平均年龄为 71.4±3.7 岁,女性占 59%。基线特征在各组间一般相似。EN 组受试者在 3 个月时比非 EN 组受试者(45% vs 27%,调整后 p=0.008)的主要结局改善率更高,但在 6 个月或 12 个月时无差异。12 个月时,EN 组血清 25(OH)维生素 D 水平也有更大的升高(4.9±7.7 vs 1.2±5.4,p=0.006),骨密度降低的比例更低(74% vs 89%,p=0.042)。PST 组受试者在优势腿伸肌力量方面的改善(2.7±6.1 vs 0.2±6.7,p=0.035,6 个月)和恶化程度(-3.5±9.7 vs -7.1±8.7,p=0.036,12 个月)均优于非 PST 组。对照组(非 EN 或非 PST)的一些次要结局也有所改善。未报告不良事件。
在台湾社区居住的老年人中,EN 干预措施在 3 个月时可改善虚弱状态,并在 12 个月时对骨密度和血清维生素 D 产生长期影响,但 PST 的效果不那么显著。
ClinicalTrials.gov:EC0970301