Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 Jan;15 Suppl 1:185-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00665.x. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
Three Central European oak species, with four provenances each, were experimentally tested in 16 large model ecosystem chambers for their response to passive air warming (AW, ambient +1-2 °C), drought (D, -43 to -60% irrigation) and their combination (AWD) for 3 years on two forest soil types of pH 4 or 7. Throughout the entire experiment, the influence of the different ambient and experimental climates on the oak trees was strong. The morphological traits of the Quercus species were affected in opposing ways in AW and D treatments, with a neutral effect in the AWD treatment. Biochemical parameters and LMA showed low relative plasticity compared to the morphological and growth parameters. The high plasticity in physiologically important parameters of the three species, such as number of intercalary veins or leaf size, indicated good drought acclimation properties. The soil type influenced leaf chlorophyll concentration, C/N and area more than drought, whereas foliage mass was more dependent on drought than on soil type. Through comparison of visible symptom development with the water deficits, a drought tolerance threshold of -1.3 MPa was determined. Although Q. pubescens had xeromorphic leaf characteristics (small leaf size, lower leaf water content, high LMA, pilosity, more chlorophyll, higher C/N) and less response to the treatments than Q. petraea and Q. robur, it suffered more leaf drought injury and shedding of leaves than Q. petraea. However, if foliage mass were used as the criterion for sustainable performance under a future climate, Q. robur would be the most appropriate species.
对来自三个中欧国家的橡树树种(每个树种四个种源)进行了为期 3 年的实验,在 16 个大型模型生态室中,通过被动空气增温(AW,环境温度升高 1-2℃)、干旱(D,灌溉减少 43%至 60%)及其组合(AWD)的方式,在两种 pH 值为 4 或 7 的森林土壤类型上进行实验。在整个实验过程中,不同的环境和实验气候对橡树的影响是强烈的。在 AW 和 D 处理中,橡树的形态特征受到相反的影响,而在 AWD 处理中则没有明显影响。生化参数和 LMA 与形态和生长参数相比,相对可塑性较低。三个树种的生理重要参数(如节间脉数或叶片大小)具有较高的可塑性,表明它们具有良好的耐旱适应特性。与干旱相比,土壤类型对叶片叶绿素浓度、C/N 和面积的影响更大,而叶量则更多地取决于干旱而非土壤类型。通过比较可见症状的发展与水分亏缺,确定了干旱耐受阈值为-1.3MPa。虽然 Q. pubescens 具有耐旱的叶形态特征(叶片较小、含水量较低、LMA 较高、多毛、叶绿素含量较高、C/N 较高),对处理的反应较小,但比 Q. petraea 和 Q. robur 更容易受到叶片干旱损伤和落叶的影响。然而,如果以叶量作为未来气候下可持续性能的标准,Q. robur 将是最合适的物种。