Centre for Research on Families and Relationships, University of Edinburgh.
Sociol Health Illn. 2013 Jun;35(5):716-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01523.x. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
The role of pain in the practice of self-injury is not straightforward. Existing accounts suggest that self-injury does not cause 'physical' pain, however self-injury is also said to alleviate 'emotional' pain by inflicting 'physical' pain. This article explores these tensions using sociological theories regarding the socio-cultural and subjective nature of pain. Analysis derives from in-depth, life-story interviews carried out in the UK with people who had self-injured. Findings contribute to on-going debates within social science regarding the nature of pain. Participants' narratives about pain and self-injury both drew on and challenged dualistic models of embodiment. I suggest that self-injury offers a unique case on which to extend existing theoretical work, which has tended to focus on pain as an unwanted and uninvited entity. In contrast, accounts of self-injury can feature pain as a central aspect of the practice, voluntarily invited into lived experience.
疼痛在自残行为中的作用并不简单。现有研究表明,自残不会引起“身体”疼痛,但自残通过造成“身体”疼痛来缓解“情绪”疼痛。本文使用关于疼痛的社会学理论,探讨了这些矛盾之处,这些理论涉及疼痛的社会文化和主观性。分析来源于在英国对有过自残行为的人进行的深入的、讲述生活故事的访谈。研究结果为社会科学界关于疼痛本质的持续争论做出了贡献。参与者关于疼痛和自残的叙述都借鉴并挑战了身心二元论模型。我认为,自残为扩展现有理论工作提供了一个独特的案例,这些理论工作往往侧重于将疼痛视为一种不受欢迎和不受邀请的存在。相比之下,自残的描述可以将疼痛作为实践的一个核心方面,是自愿邀请到生活体验中的。