School of Geography, Politics and Sociology (Sociology), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Department of Sociology, University of York, Wentworth College, York, UK.
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Jan;42(1):157-170. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12994. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
This article makes the case for a sociological focus on the communicative, relational and interactional dimensions of nonsuicidal self-injury. While current research tends to be dominated by highly individual and intrapsychic models, it is increasingly observed that such models leave a social dimension to the practice unexplained. A burgeoning sociological literature has begun to address this paradox of the social in self-injury; however, we argue that the role of the social must be considered beyond the issues of aetiology, social learning and social construal/construction that are typically covered in this literature. Specifically, we argue that, since the lived meanings of self-injury directly implicate the interactional along with the intrapsychic, a more systematic focus on the role of social relations and social communication is vital. To illustrate this conceptual argument and embed it in the lived experiences of self-injury, we draw on two case studies taken from pilot research conducted by the authors. The more thoroughly sociological approach to self-injury that we present here offers an important compliment to the existing evidence base by reframing the absent presence of social communication contained within it, and suggesting important future directions for research.
本文主张将社会学的焦点放在非自杀性自伤的交际、关系和互动维度上。虽然当前的研究往往以高度个体化和内在心理模型为主导,但越来越多的人观察到,这些模型无法解释这种行为的社会维度。日益丰富的社会学文献已经开始解决自我伤害中这种社会悖论;然而,我们认为,必须超越该文献中通常涉及的病因、社会学习和社会建构/构造等问题来考虑社会的作用。具体来说,我们认为,由于自我伤害的体验意义直接涉及到内在心理和互动,因此更系统地关注社会关系和社会交流的作用至关重要。为了说明这一概念性论点,并将其嵌入自我伤害的体验中,我们借鉴了作者进行的试点研究中的两个案例研究。我们在这里提出的更全面的社会学方法对现有证据基础提供了重要的补充,它重新构建了其中包含的缺失的社会交流,并为未来的研究提供了重要的方向。