Suppr超能文献

使用血清蛋白和免疫固定电泳从滤纸上鉴定 M 蛋白。

Identification of M protein from filter paper using serum protein and immunofixation electrophoresis.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Oct;138(4):604-8. doi: 10.1309/AJCPFY6HLIT6HMQN.

Abstract

Serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) are standard methods for detection and monitoring of monoclonal (M) proteins. However, these tests are rarely available in the remote areas, especially in developing countries. Transportation of fresh serum (FS) samples is also usually inconvenient. This study investigated M-protein identification using serum blot on filter paper (FP). SPE and IFE were performed on FS and FP specimens using the Sebia Hydrasys automated electrophoresis system. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess sample stability and agreement of FS vs FP. The FP method showed good agreement with the FS method. The r values for correlation of albumin levels-α(1), α(2), β, and γ (%)-between FP and FS samples in SPE were all more than 0.95 (P < .01). IFE displayed no significant difference between those 2 methods in the identification of M protein. The FP method demonstrated an accurate and reproducible alternative to FS for identification of M protein using SPE and IFE.

摘要

血清蛋白电泳(SPE)和免疫固定电泳(IFE)是检测和监测单克隆(M)蛋白的标准方法。然而,这些检测在偏远地区很少使用,特别是在发展中国家。新鲜血清(FS)样本的运输通常也不方便。本研究使用滤纸条上的血清印迹(FP)来研究 M 蛋白的鉴定。使用 Sebia Hydrasys 自动化电泳系统在 FS 和 FP 标本上进行 SPE 和 IFE。进行了统计学分析以评估 FS 与 FP 之间的样本稳定性和一致性。FP 方法与 FS 方法具有良好的一致性。在 SPE 中,白蛋白水平-α(1)、α(2)、β 和 γ(%)-与 FS 样本之间的 r 值均大于 0.95(P <.01)。IFE 在 M 蛋白的鉴定方面,两种方法之间没有显著差异。FP 方法在使用 SPE 和 IFE 鉴定 M 蛋白方面,是 FS 的一种准确且可重复的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验