Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Oct;138(4):604-8. doi: 10.1309/AJCPFY6HLIT6HMQN.
Serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) are standard methods for detection and monitoring of monoclonal (M) proteins. However, these tests are rarely available in the remote areas, especially in developing countries. Transportation of fresh serum (FS) samples is also usually inconvenient. This study investigated M-protein identification using serum blot on filter paper (FP). SPE and IFE were performed on FS and FP specimens using the Sebia Hydrasys automated electrophoresis system. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess sample stability and agreement of FS vs FP. The FP method showed good agreement with the FS method. The r values for correlation of albumin levels-α(1), α(2), β, and γ (%)-between FP and FS samples in SPE were all more than 0.95 (P < .01). IFE displayed no significant difference between those 2 methods in the identification of M protein. The FP method demonstrated an accurate and reproducible alternative to FS for identification of M protein using SPE and IFE.
血清蛋白电泳(SPE)和免疫固定电泳(IFE)是检测和监测单克隆(M)蛋白的标准方法。然而,这些检测在偏远地区很少使用,特别是在发展中国家。新鲜血清(FS)样本的运输通常也不方便。本研究使用滤纸条上的血清印迹(FP)来研究 M 蛋白的鉴定。使用 Sebia Hydrasys 自动化电泳系统在 FS 和 FP 标本上进行 SPE 和 IFE。进行了统计学分析以评估 FS 与 FP 之间的样本稳定性和一致性。FP 方法与 FS 方法具有良好的一致性。在 SPE 中,白蛋白水平-α(1)、α(2)、β 和 γ(%)-与 FS 样本之间的 r 值均大于 0.95(P <.01)。IFE 在 M 蛋白的鉴定方面,两种方法之间没有显著差异。FP 方法在使用 SPE 和 IFE 鉴定 M 蛋白方面,是 FS 的一种准确且可重复的替代方法。