The Pufendorf Institute for Advanced Studies, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Astrobiology. 2012 Oct;12(10):976-84. doi: 10.1089/ast.2011.0787. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
If we eventually discover extraterrestrial life, do we have any moral obligations for how to treat the life-forms we find; does it matter whether they are intelligent, sentient, or just microbial-and does it matter that they are extraterrestrial? In this paper, I examine these questions by looking at two of the basic questions in moral philosophy: What does it take to be a moral object? and What has value of what kind? I will start with the first of these questions by looking at the most important attempts to answer this question on our own planet and by asking whether and how they could be applied to extraterrestrial life. The results range from a very strong protection of all extraterrestrial life and all extraterrestrial environments, whether inhabited or not, to total exclusion of extraterrestrial life. Subsequently, I also examine whether extraterrestrial life that lacks moral status can have value to human or alien life with moral status, and if that could generate any obligations for how to treat extraterrestrial life. Based on this analysis, I conclude that extraterrestrial life-forms can have both instrumental value and end value to moral objects, which has strong implications for how to treat them.
如果我们最终发现了外星生命,我们是否有任何道德义务来对待我们发现的生命形式;它们是否具有智能、感知能力,或者只是微生物,这是否重要;而它们是否来自外星,这是否重要?在本文中,我通过考察道德哲学中的两个基本问题来探讨这些问题:成为道德客体需要什么?以及什么样的东西具有什么样的价值?我将从第一个问题开始,先考察在我们自己的星球上对这个问题的最重要的尝试性回答,并询问这些回答是否以及如何可以应用于外星生命。结果从对所有外星生命和所有外星环境(无论是否有人居住)的强烈保护,到对外星生命的完全排斥,不一而足。随后,我还考察了缺乏道德地位的外星生命对具有道德地位的人类或外星生命是否具有价值,如果是这样,这是否会对外星生命的处理产生任何义务。基于这一分析,我得出结论,外星生命形式对道德客体具有工具价值和内在价值,这对如何对待它们具有很强的启示意义。