Psychology Department, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Memory. 2013;21(2):230-48. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.725736. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
Many researchers employ single-item scales of subjective experiences such as imagery and confidence to assess autobiographical memory. We tested the hypothesis that four latent constructs, recollection, belief, impact, and rehearsal, account for the variance in commonly used scales across four different types of autobiographical memory: earliest childhood memory, cue word memory of personal experience, highly vivid memory, and most stressful memory. Participants rated each memory on scales hypothesised to be indicators of one of four latent constructs. Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses and structural analyses confirmed the similarity of the latent constructs of recollection, belief, impact, and rehearsal, as well as the similarity of the structural relationships among those constructs across memory type. The observed pattern of mean differences between the varieties of autobiographical experiences was consistent with prior research and theory in the study of autobiographical memory.
许多研究人员使用单一项目的主观体验量表,如意象和信心,来评估自传体记忆。我们检验了这样一个假设,即四个潜在的构念,即回忆、信念、影响和排练,可以解释在四种不同类型的自传体记忆中常用量表的差异:最早的童年记忆、个人经历的提示词记忆、高度生动的记忆和最有压力的记忆。参与者根据假设为四个潜在构念之一的指标对每个记忆进行评分。多组验证性因素分析和结构分析证实了回忆、信念、影响和排练的潜在构念的相似性,以及这些构念在记忆类型之间的结构关系的相似性。观察到的各种自传体经验之间的平均差异模式与自传体记忆研究中的先前研究和理论一致。