• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理国民保健制度中严重患者安全事件的后果:一项在线调查研究。

Managing the after effects of serious patient safety incidents in the NHS: an online survey study.

机构信息

Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21(12):1001-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000826. Epub 2012 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000826
PMID:23015097
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the current state of practice in English NHS Trusts in relation to the communication of serious patient safety incidents to patients and families and support for all parties involved.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional design using online surveys.

PARTICIPANTS

209 patient safety managers, responsible for the 'Being Open' policy (54% response rate).

SETTING

English NHS Trusts.

RESULTS

98% of the participants reported that they are familiar with the National Patient Safety Agency Being Open guidance and 82% that they implement it more than half the time when incidents occur. However, provision of timely information was not reported as routine, with two-thirds of the discussions taking place 3-6 months [corrected] after the investigation. The frequency of taking responsibility for harm was low for incidents of different severity levels but significantly lower for less serious ones (p<0.001). Follow-ups of patients in the long term and ex gratia payments were provided less than half the time. The most highly rated barriers to being open were clinical staff's fear of negative reactions from patients or their families and anxiety about litigation. Support practices for staff, such as debriefing and training on being open, were acknowledged as highly important but not always available.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of the importance of being open is high among patient safety managers in English NHS Trusts, but there is still considerable scope for improvement in the management of the after effects of patient safety incidents. More research is needed on patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences for support after patient safety incidents.

摘要

目的

调查英国国民保健署信托机构在向患者和家属通报严重患者安全事件以及为所有相关方提供支持方面的实践现状。

设计

使用在线调查的横断面设计。

参与者

209 名负责“公开透明”政策的患者安全经理(回应率为 54%)。

地点

英国国民保健署信托机构。

结果

98%的参与者报告称,他们熟悉国家患者安全局的“公开透明”指南,82%的人在发生事件时超过一半的时间实施该指南。然而,及时提供信息并不是常规做法,三分之二的讨论是在调查结束 3-6 个月后进行的。对于不同严重程度的事件,承担伤害责任的频率较低,但对于不太严重的事件则显著较低(p<0.001)。对患者进行长期随访和给予特惠赔偿的情况不到一半。公开透明的最大障碍是临床工作人员担心来自患者或其家属的负面反应,以及对诉讼的焦虑。对员工进行汇报和公开透明培训等支持性做法被认为非常重要,但并非总是可用。

结论

英国国民保健署信托机构的患者安全管理人员高度意识到公开透明的重要性,但在管理患者安全事件的后果方面仍有很大的改进空间。需要进一步研究患者和医疗保健专业人员在患者安全事件后的支持偏好。

相似文献

1
Managing the after effects of serious patient safety incidents in the NHS: an online survey study.管理国民保健制度中严重患者安全事件的后果:一项在线调查研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21(12):1001-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000826. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
2
Managing the after effects of serious patient safety incidents in the NHS: an online survey study.管理国民保健制度中严重患者安全事件的后果:一项在线调查研究。
Postgrad Med J. 2013 May;89(1051):266-73. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-000826rep.
3
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
4
Overseeing oversight: governance of quality and safety by hospital boards in the English NHS.监督监督:英国国民医疗服务体系中医院董事会对质量与安全的治理
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1 Suppl):9-16. doi: 10.1177/1355819614558471.
5
Are health professionals' perceptions of patient safety related to figures on safety incidents?卫生专业人员对患者安全的看法是否与安全事件的数字有关?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;19(5):944-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01887.x. Epub 2012 Jul 29.
6
[Patient safety in general practice].[全科医疗中的患者安全]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
7
What can we learn about patient safety from information sources within an acute hospital: a step on the ladder of integrated risk management?从急性医院内部的信息源中,我们能了解到哪些关于患者安全的信息:综合风险管理阶梯上的一步?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):209-15. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020008.
8
Health-care professionals' views about safety in maternity services: a qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员对产科服务安全性的看法:一项定性研究。
Midwifery. 2009 Feb;25(1):21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.11.004. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
9
Do falls and falls-injuries in hospital indicate negligent care -- and how big is the risk? A retrospective analysis of the NHS Litigation Authority Database of clinical negligence claims, resulting from falls in hospitals in England 1995 to 2006.医院内的跌倒及跌倒致伤是否表明存在护理疏忽——风险有多大?对英国国民医疗服务诉讼局1995年至2006年期间因医院内跌倒引发的临床疏忽索赔数据库进行的回顾性分析。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Dec;17(6):431-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024703.
10
The challenges in monitoring and preventing patient safety incidents for people with intellectual disabilities in NHS acute hospitals: evidence from a mixed-methods study.英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)急症医院中智障患者的患者安全事件监测与预防挑战:一项混合方法研究的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 24;14:432. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-432.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning from safety incidents in high-reliability organizations: a systematic review of learning tools that could be adapted and used in healthcare.从高可靠性组织的安全事件中学习:对可在医疗保健领域改编和应用的学习工具的系统评价
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Mar 17;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab046.
2
Surgical incidents and their impact on operating theatre staff: qualitative study.手术事故及其对手术室工作人员的影响:定性研究。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa007.
3
Doctors' experiences of adverse events in secondary care: the professional and personal impact.
二级医疗保健中医生的不良事件经历:职业和个人影响。
Clin Med (Lond). 2014 Dec;14(6):585-90. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-6-585.