Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin.
Sports Health. 2010 Sep;2(5):368-74. doi: 10.1177/1941738110374624.
The shoulder is the third-most commonly injured body part in volleyball, with the majority of shoulder problems resulting from chronic overuse.
Significant kinetic differences exist among specific types of volleyball serves and spikes.
Controlled laboratory study.
Fourteen healthy female collegiate volleyball players performed 5 successful trials of 4 skills: 2 directional spikes, an off-speed roll shot, and the float serve. Volunteers who were competent in jump serves (n, 5) performed 5 trials of that skill. A 240-Hz 3-dimensional automatic digitizing system captured each trial. Multivariate analysis of variance and post hoc paired t tests were used to compare kinetic parameters for the shoulder and elbow across all the skills (except the jump serve). A similar statistical analysis was performed for upper extremity kinematics.
Forces, torques, and angular velocities at the shoulder and elbow were lowest for the roll shot and second-lowest for the float serve. No differences were detected between the cross-body and straight-ahead spikes. Although there was an insufficient number of participants to statistically analyze the jump serve, the data for it appear similar to those of the cross-body and straight-ahead spikes. Shoulder abduction at the instant of ball contact was approximately 130° for all skills, which is substantially greater than that previously reported for female athletes performing tennis serves or baseball pitches.
Because shoulder kinetics were greatest during spiking, the volleyball player with symptoms of shoulder overuse may wish to reduce the number of repetitions performed during practice. Limiting the number of jump serves may also reduce the athlete's risk of overuse-related shoulder dysfunction.
Volleyball-specific overhead skills, such as the spike and serve, produce considerable upper extremity force and torque, which may contribute to the risk of shoulder injury.
肩部是排球运动中第三易受伤的身体部位,大多数肩部问题都是由慢性过度使用引起的。
特定类型的排球发球和扣球之间存在显著的动力学差异。
对照实验室研究。
14 名健康的女性大学生排球运动员完成了 4 种技能的 5 次成功尝试:2 种定向扣球、一种变速滚球、以及飘球。能够完成跳发球的志愿者(n=5)进行了 5 次该技能的尝试。一个 240Hz 的三维自动数字化系统捕获了每个试验。使用多变量方差分析和事后配对 t 检验比较了所有技能(跳发球除外)的肩部和肘部的动力学参数。对上肢运动学进行了类似的统计分析。
滚球和飘球的肩部和肘部受力、扭矩和角速度最低。交叉体和直线扣球之间没有差异。虽然跳发球的参与者人数不足以进行统计分析,但它的数据似乎与交叉体和直线扣球的数据相似。所有技能的触球瞬间肩部外展约为 130°,明显大于以前报道的女性运动员进行网球发球或棒球投球的角度。
由于扣球时肩部动力学最大,肩部过度使用症状的排球运动员可能希望减少练习中的重复次数。限制跳发球的次数也可能降低运动员过度使用相关肩部功能障碍的风险。
排球特有的头顶技能,如扣球和发球,会产生相当大的上肢力和扭矩,这可能会增加肩部受伤的风险。