• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素及会阴侧切术的作用。

Obstetric anal sphincter injury risk factors and the role of the mediolateral episiotomy.

作者信息

Twidale Emily, Cornell Kristin, Litzow Nicholas, Hotchin Anne

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Feb;53(1):17-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01483.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01483.x
PMID:23016835
Abstract

AIMS

Investigate risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and their incidence between 2006 and 2010 at a regional teaching hospital in Australia. Determine whether a correlation exists between a decrease in OASI rates and an increase in mediolateral episiotomies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study conducted at the Geelong Hospital, Barwon Health, Victoria, Australia. Every adequately documented vaginal birth from 2006 to 2010 in the hospital was included (N = 7314, cases of OASI = 239). Patient data were obtained from the Barwon Health Birth Outcomes System database. Multinomial logistic regression, Pearson's correlation coefficient and relative risk calculations were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Risk factors for OASI include nulliparity (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.95-3.57, P < 0.01), instrumental delivery (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.82-3.55, P < 0.01) and birth weight greater than 4 kg (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.11-2.19, P = 0.01). There was a significant correlation between increasing mediolateral episiotomy use from 12.56% to 20.10% and a reduction in OASI rates over the 5-year period (Pearson's correlation coefficient: -0.94, P = 0.02). The correlation remained when analysing normal vaginal births in isolation from instrumental (Pearson's correlation coefficient: -0.89, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Clear risk factors for OASI include nulliparity, macrosomia and instrumental delivery. There was a significant correlation between increasing mediolateral episiotomy rates from 12.56% to 20.10% and decreasing OASI.

摘要

目的

调查澳大利亚一家地区教学医院2006年至2010年间产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)的危险因素及其发生率。确定OASI发生率的下降与会阴侧切术增加之间是否存在相关性。

材料与方法

在澳大利亚维多利亚州贝旺健康服务中心的吉朗医院进行一项回顾性观察研究。纳入2006年至2010年在该医院有充分记录的每例阴道分娩(N = 7314,OASI病例 = 239)。患者数据从贝旺健康服务中心出生结局系统数据库中获取。采用多项逻辑回归、Pearson相关系数和相对风险计算进行分析。

结果

OASI的危险因素包括初产(比值比2.64,95%可信区间1.95 - 3.57,P < 0.01)、器械助产(比值比2.54,95%可信区间1.82 - 3.55,P < 0.01)和出生体重超过4 kg(比值比1.56,95%可信区间1.11 - 2.19,P = 0.01)。在5年期间,会阴侧切术使用率从12.56%增加到20.10%与OASI发生率降低之间存在显著相关性(Pearson相关系数:-0.94,P = 0.02)。单独分析正常阴道分娩与器械助产时,这种相关性仍然存在(Pearson相关系数:-0.89,P = 0.04)。

结论

OASI明确的危险因素包括初产、巨大儿和器械助产。会阴侧切术使用率从12.56%增加到20.10%与OASI发生率降低之间存在显著相关性。

相似文献

1
Obstetric anal sphincter injury risk factors and the role of the mediolateral episiotomy.产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素及会阴侧切术的作用。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Feb;53(1):17-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01483.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
2
Could a mediolateral episiotomy prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury?会阴正中切开术能否预防产科肛门括约肌损伤?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Jun;150(2):142-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
3
Obstetric anal sphincter injury risk reduction: a retrospective observational analysis.降低产科肛门括约肌损伤风险:一项回顾性观察分析。
J Perinat Med. 2014 Nov;42(6):761-7. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0269.
4
Does the implementation of a restrictive episiotomy policy for operative deliveries increase the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury?实行限制会阴切开术的分娩政策是否会增加产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;300(1):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05174-0. Epub 2019 May 5.
5
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in south India.印度南部一家三级医疗中心产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)的危险因素。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):391-396. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3398-0. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
6
Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.会阴侧切术可降低阴道助产分娩时肛门括约肌损伤的风险。
BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(1):104-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01554.x. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
7
Risk factors for the recurrence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury and the role of a mediolateral episiotomy: an analysis of a national registry.产科肛门括约肌损伤复发的危险因素和正中旁会阴切开术的作用:国家注册分析。
BJOG. 2020 Jul;127(8):951-956. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16263. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
8
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study.产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Birth. 2006 Jun;33(2):117-22. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00088.x.
9
Predictive factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: systematic review and meta-analysis.初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;62(4):486-496. doi: 10.1002/uog.26292.
10
Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy.预测分娩时严重会阴创伤的因素:产钳助产常规联合会阴侧切术的作用
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):875-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.035.

引用本文的文献

1
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury After Episiometer-Guided Versus Conventional Episiotomy in Instrumental Deliveries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.器械助产中会阴测量仪引导下会阴切开术与传统会阴切开术术后产科肛门括约肌损伤的随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Dec;35(12):2375-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05917-x. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
2
Prevalence and associated factors of maternal birth trauma following vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North-West Ethiopia, 2022.2022 年,在埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔大学综合专科医院,阴道分娩后产妇分娩创伤的流行情况及相关因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jun 27;24(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06635-4.
3
Does a missed obstetric anal sphincter injury at time of delivery affect short-term functional outcome?
分娩时漏诊的产科肛门括约肌损伤会影响短期功能结局吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Jan;100(1):26-32. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0140. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
4
Functional and quality of life outcomes following obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): does the grade of injury affect outcomes?产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)后的功能和生活质量结局:损伤程度是否会影响结局?
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1709-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3334-3. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
The optimal angle of the mediolateral episiotomy at crowning of the head during labor.分娩时胎头着冠时会阴侧切的最佳角度。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Dec;28(12):1795-1799. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3349-9. Epub 2017 May 5.
6
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.会阴切开术后产科肛门括约肌损伤:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1459-67. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-2956-1. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
7
Mode of vaginal delivery: a modifiable intrapartum risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury.阴道分娩方式:产科肛门括约肌损伤的一个可改变的产时危险因素。
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2015;2015:679470. doi: 10.1155/2015/679470. Epub 2015 Feb 1.