Department of Sociology, University of Utah, United States; Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies (IMDEA), Spain.
Soc Sci Res. 2012 May;41(3):514-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.12.005. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
Military expenditures have escalated over the last three decades in both developed and less developed countries, without a corresponding expansion of military personnel. Spending has instead been directed towards hi-tech weaponry, what we refer to as the "new" military. We hypothesize that this new, increasingly capital-intensive military is no longer a pathway of upward mobility or employer of last resort for many uneducated, unskilled, or unemployed people, with significant consequences for those individuals and society as a whole. One such consequence, we argue, is an increase in income inequality. We test this hypothesis with cross-national panel models, estimated for 82 developed and less developed countries from 1970 to 2000. Findings indicate that military capital-intensiveness, as measured by military expenditures per soldier, exacerbates income inequality net of control variables. Neither total military expenditures/GDP nor military participation has a significant effect. It appears from these findings that today's "new" military establishment is abrogating its historical role as an equalizing force in society, with important policy implications.
在过去的三十年中,无论是发达国家还是发展中国家,军费开支都在不断攀升,而军事人员却没有相应增加。支出反而转向了高科技武器,即我们所说的“新”军事。我们假设,这种新的、资本密集度越来越高的军事力量,对于许多没有受过教育、没有技能或没有工作的人来说,不再是向上流动的途径或最后的雇主,这对个人和整个社会都有重大影响。我们认为,其中一个后果是收入不平等的加剧。我们使用跨国家面板模型对此假设进行了检验,该模型是根据 1970 年至 2000 年期间 82 个发达国家和发展中国家的数据进行估计的。研究结果表明,以士兵人均军费支出衡量的军事资本密集度,在控制变量之外加剧了收入不平等。军费总支出/GDP 和军事参与都没有显著影响。从这些发现可以看出,当今的“新”军事机构正在放弃其在社会中作为平等力量的历史角色,这具有重要的政策意义。