Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:1082-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.08.019. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
Although the multivariate structure of traffic accidents has been recognized in the safety literature for over a decade now, univariate identification and ranking of hotspots is still dominant. The present paper advocates the use of multivariate identification and ranking of hotspots based on statistical depth functions, which are useful tools for non-parametric multivariate analysis as they provide center-out ordering of multivariate data. Thus, a depth-based multivariate method is proposed for the identification and ranking of hotspots using the full Bayes (FB) approach. The proposed method is applied to a sample of 236 signalized intersections in the Greater Vancouver Area. Various multivariate Poisson log-normal (MVPLN) models were used for data analysis. For each model, the FB posterior estimates were obtained using the Markov Chains Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques and several goodness-of-fit measures were used for model selection. Using a depth threshold of 0.025, the proposed method identified 26 intersections (11%) as potential hotspots. The choice of a depth threshold is a delicate decision and it is suggested to determine the threshold according to the amount of funding available for safety improvement, which is the usual practice in univariate hotspot identification (HSID). Also, the results show that the performance of the proposed multivariate depth-based FB HSID method is superior to that of an analogous method based on the depths of accident frequency (AF) in terms of sensitivity, specificity and the sum of norms (lengths) of Poisson mean vectors.
尽管交通事故的多元结构在安全文献中已经被认识了十多年,但单变量识别和热点排名仍然占主导地位。本文提倡使用基于统计深度函数的多元识别和热点排名,这是一种用于非参数多元分析的有用工具,因为它们为多元数据提供了从中心到外围的排序。因此,提出了一种基于深度的方法,使用全贝叶斯(FB)方法来识别和排名热点。该方法应用于大温哥华地区的 236 个信号交叉口的样本。使用了各种多元泊松对数正态(MVPLN)模型进行数据分析。对于每个模型,使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)技术获得 FB 后验估计,并使用几个拟合优度度量来进行模型选择。使用深度阈值 0.025,该方法确定了 26 个交叉口(11%)为潜在热点。深度阈值的选择是一个微妙的决策,建议根据安全改进的可用资金量来确定阈值,这是单变量热点识别(HSID)中的常用做法。此外,结果表明,基于事故频率(AF)深度的类似方法相比,基于深度的多元 FB HSID 方法在灵敏度、特异性和泊松均值向量的范数(长度)之和方面表现更优。