Miller K S, Smith E A, Kinsella M, Schabel S I, Silver R M
Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Feb;141(2):301-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/141.2.301.
Progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS), or scleroderma, is a disease of unknown etiology that involves many organ systems, including the lungs. The interstitial lung disease of systemic sclerosis is becoming an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality. This process has been previously evaluated with single-site bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), gallium scanning, pulmonary function testing, and, occasionally, by open lung biopsy. As BAL has been shown to correlate well with open lung biopsy in systemic sclerosis, we sought to determine if single-site BAL accurately reflects alveolitis in a second site in the lung, and if BAL results correlate with other noninvasive tests of lung inflammation: gallium uptake, chest radiography, or arterial blood gas analysis. We performed 17 studies in 13 patients with scleroderma and found no significant lobar differences in lavage results or gallium scanning. By our criteria for normal versus active alveolitis, only two of 17 patient lavages would have been classified as normal by one side and abnormal by the other side. Although percent gallium uptake was equal bilaterally and supported the concept of alveolitis uniformity, gallium uptake intensity did not correlate with activity as measured by BAL. Furthermore, chest radiograph and arterial blood gas analysis did not correlate with BAL results or gallium scanning. We believe these data support the suitability of single-site lavage in the investigation of systemic-sclerosis-associated alveolitis and diminish the importance of gallium scanning in the investigation of systemic sclerosis pulmonary disease.
进行性系统性硬化症(PSS),即硬皮病,是一种病因不明的疾病,累及包括肺在内的多个器官系统。系统性硬化症的间质性肺病正成为发病率和死亡率上升的一个原因。此前已通过单部位支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)、镓扫描、肺功能测试,偶尔还通过开胸肺活检对这一过程进行评估。由于在系统性硬化症中已证明BAL与开胸肺活检有良好的相关性,我们试图确定单部位BAL是否能准确反映肺部第二个部位的肺泡炎,以及BAL结果是否与其他肺部炎症的非侵入性检查相关:镓摄取、胸部X线摄影或动脉血气分析。我们对13例硬皮病患者进行了17项研究,发现灌洗结果或镓扫描在叶间没有显著差异。根据我们对正常与活动性肺泡炎的标准,17例患者灌洗中只有2例按一侧分类为正常而另一侧为异常。虽然双侧镓摄取百分比相等并支持肺泡炎均匀性的概念,但镓摄取强度与BAL测量的活性不相关。此外,胸部X线摄影和动脉血气分析与BAL结果或镓扫描不相关。我们认为这些数据支持单部位灌洗在系统性硬化症相关肺泡炎研究中的适用性,并降低了镓扫描在系统性硬化症肺部疾病研究中的重要性。