Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):854-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.100. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
Patients with a single microfocus of prostate cancer at initial biopsy represent the ideal candidates for active surveillance. We investigate whether the number of cores taken affects the concordance rate between microfocus of prostate cancer and the confirmation of a pathologically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Data were analyzed from 233 patients with a single microfocus of prostate cancer at initial transrectal prostate biopsy (a single focus of Gleason 6 involving 5% or less of the core) subsequently treated with radical prostatectomy. The chi-square test, cubic spline analyses and logistic regression analyses were used to depict the relationship between the number of cores taken and the probability of confirming the presence of an indolent disease (pathologically confirmed insignificant prostate cancer defined as radical prostatectomy Gleason score 6 or less, tumor volume 0.5 ml or less and organ confined disease).
Overall 65 patients (27.9%) showed pathologically confirmed insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy. The rate of pathologically confirmed insignificant prostate cancer was 3.8%, 29.6% and 39.4% in patients who underwent biopsy of 12 or fewer cores, 13 to 18 cores and 19 or more cores, respectively (p <0.001). After adjusting for the available confounders, age (p = 0.04), number of cores taken (p <0.001) and prostate specific antigen density (p <0.02) were independent predictors of pathologically confirmed insignificant prostate cancer.
Of patients diagnosed with a single microfocus of prostate cancer the number of biopsy cores taken was a major independent predictor of having pathologically confirmed insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy. Therefore, when active surveillance is considered as a possible alternative in patients with microfocus of prostate cancer, the number of cores taken should be taken into account in decision making.
在初始活检时患有单个前列腺癌微焦点的患者是主动监测的理想候选者。我们研究了在根治性前列腺切除术中取芯数量是否会影响前列腺癌微焦点与病理上无意义前列腺癌之间的一致性率。
分析了 233 例初始经直肠前列腺活检时存在单个前列腺癌微焦点(单个 Gleason 6 级焦点,占核心的 5%或更少)的患者的数据,随后接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗。使用卡方检验、三次样条分析和逻辑回归分析来描绘取芯数量与确认惰性疾病(病理证实为无意义前列腺癌定义为根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分 6 或更低、肿瘤体积 0.5ml 或更小和器官局限疾病)存在的概率之间的关系。
总体而言,65 例(27.9%)患者在根治性前列腺切除术后显示出病理证实为无意义前列腺癌。在接受 12 个或更少核心活检、13 至 18 个核心活检和 19 个或更多核心活检的患者中,病理证实为无意义前列腺癌的发生率分别为 3.8%、29.6%和 39.4%(p<0.001)。在调整了可用混杂因素后,年龄(p=0.04)、取芯数量(p<0.001)和前列腺特异性抗原密度(p<0.02)是病理证实为无意义前列腺癌的独立预测因素。
在诊断为单个前列腺癌微焦点的患者中,取芯数量是在根治性前列腺切除术中存在病理证实为无意义前列腺癌的主要独立预测因素。因此,当主动监测被视为前列腺癌微焦点患者的一种可能替代方案时,在决策制定中应考虑取芯数量。