• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经腹腔与经腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术:前瞻性随机比较研究。

Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: a prospective randomized comparison study.

机构信息

Department of Urology and the Department of Psychiatry (AA), C.S.M. Medical University (Upgraded King George Medical College), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):940-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.114. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.114
PMID:23023151
Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy approaches, and determined whether one technique is superior to the other.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective randomized study from January 2009 to May 2012, 48 patients with proximal or mid ureteral stones underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy or retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. The randomization occurred on a 1:1 basis. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS® version 15.0 using the Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests with p <0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The difference in visual pain analog score and mean tramadol requirement on days 1 and 2 between the 2 groups was statistically significant, and was higher in group 1 (p <0.05). Postoperative hospital stay and paralytic ileus rates were significantly higher in group 1 (p <0.05). The differences in total operative time and intracorporeal suturing time between the 2 groups were not statistically significant. However, successful stone removal was equal in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For proximal or mid ureteral large and impacted stones, transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is significantly associated with pain, greater tramadol requirement, ileus and longer hospital stay than retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. However, successful stone removal remains the same in both groups.

摘要

目的

我们比较了腹腔镜经腹腔和后腹腔输尿管切开取石术,并确定了一种技术是否优于另一种技术。

材料和方法

在这项前瞻性随机研究中,我们纳入了 48 例患有近端或中段输尿管结石的患者,分别采用经腹腔腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术和后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术。随机分组采用 1:1 比例。第 1 组和第 2 组分别为接受经腹腔腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术和后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术的患者。收集并分析了人口统计学和临床特征以及术后数据。使用 SPSS®版本 15.0 进行统计分析,采用 Fisher 确切检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验,p<0.05 认为具有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者在视觉模拟疼痛评分和术后第 1 天和第 2 天曲马多需求的平均值方面存在显著差异,第 1 组更高(p<0.05)。第 1 组的术后住院时间和麻痹性肠梗阻发生率明显更高(p<0.05)。两组之间的总手术时间和腔内缝合时间差异无统计学意义。然而,两组的结石清除率相等。

结论

对于近端或中段输尿管大而嵌顿的结石,与后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术相比,经腹腔腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术与疼痛、更大的曲马多需求、肠梗阻和更长的住院时间显著相关。然而,两组的结石清除率相同。

相似文献

1
Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: a prospective randomized comparison study.经腹腔与经腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术:前瞻性随机比较研究。
J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):940-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.114. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
2
After a urological laparoscopic training programme, which laparoscopic method is safer and more feasible in the management of proximal ureteral stones: Transperitoneal or retroperitoneal?在完成一项泌尿外科腹腔镜培训项目后,对于近端输尿管结石的处理,哪种腹腔镜方法更安全且更可行:经腹还是后腹腔?
J Pak Med Assoc. 2016 Aug;66(8):971-6.
3
Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy versus conventional laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.后腹腔镜单部位与传统腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效比较。
Urology. 2013 Mar;81(3):567-72. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.033. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
4
Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy.前瞻性随机研究治疗大型上段输尿管结石:体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术与腹腔镜。
J Urol. 2012 Jan;187(1):164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.054. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
5
Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in selected patients.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Jul;93(7):794-8.
6
Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: Randomized clinical trial.
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Jun;11(3):122.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.019. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
7
Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy for recurrent lower-ureteral stones previously treated with open ureterolithotomy: initial experience in 11 cases.腹腔镜经腹输尿管切开取石术治疗既往接受过开放性输尿管切开取石术的复发性下段输尿管结石:11例初步经验
J Endourol. 2007 May;21(5):525-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0354.
8
Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy versus conventional laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.腹膜后腹腔镜单孔输尿管切开取石术与传统腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术的比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(5):865-8.
9
Prospective randomized comparison between transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty and retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂成形术与后腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗原发性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的前瞻性随机对照研究
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00366.
10
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach during the learning curve.腹腔镜肾盂成形术:学习曲线期间经腹腔途径与腹膜后途径的比较
Urol Int. 2013;90(2):130-5. doi: 10.1159/000343989. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of efficacy and safety of open and laparoscopic proximal ureterolithotomy for ureteral stone management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.开放与腹腔镜下输尿管上段切开取石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效与安全性比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Narra J. 2024 Apr;4(1):e679. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i1.679. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
2
Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型近端输尿管结石的系统评价和荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Mar;18(1):42-51. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.119776. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
3
Comparative evaluation of retrograde intrarenal surgery, antegrade ureterorenoscopy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones larger than 1.5 cm.
逆行肾内手术、顺行输尿管镜检查和腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗直径大于1.5 cm的嵌顿性近端输尿管结石的比较评估
Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(1):57-63. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0174.R1. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
4
Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.各种≥10mm 近端输尿管结石手术治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Nov-Dec;46(6):902-926. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0550.
5
Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials.半硬性输尿管镜碎石术与腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗上段输尿管大结石:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jul-Aug;42(4):645-54. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0696.
6
The Gachon University Ureteral Narrowing score: A comprehensive standardized system for predicting necessity of ureteral dilatation to treat proximal ureteral calculi.加图立大学输尿管狭窄评分:预测治疗近端输尿管结石是否需要输尿管扩张的综合标准化系统。
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Jul;57(4):280-5. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.280. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
7
Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy; which is better: Transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach?腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术;哪种方法更好:经腹腔途径还是腹膜后途径?
Turk J Urol. 2015 Dec;41(4):185-90. doi: 10.5152/tud.2015.03442.
8
Laparoscopic management of distal ureteric stones in a bilharzial ureter: Results of a single-centre prospective study.腹腔镜治疗血吸虫病性输尿管远端结石:单中心前瞻性研究结果
Arab J Urol. 2015 Sep;13(3):182-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
9
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm.比较腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗直径大于12mm的上段输尿管嵌顿结石的效果。
World J Urol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1841-5. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1545-0. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
10
Prospective randomized comparison between transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty and retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂成形术与后腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗原发性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的前瞻性随机对照研究
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00366.