• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在纳什谈判解内,将多个随机馅饼公平分配给多个代理。

On the fair division of multiple stochastic pies to multiple agents within the Nash bargaining solution.

机构信息

Sector of Industrial Management and Operational Research, School of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044535. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0044535
PMID:23024752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3443099/
Abstract

The fair division of a surplus is one of the most widely examined problems. This paper focuses on bargaining problems with fixed disagreement payoffs where risk-neutral agents have reached an agreement that is the Nash-bargaining solution (NBS). We consider a stochastic environment, in which the overall return consists of multiple pies with uncertain sizes and we examine how these pies can be allocated with fairness among agents. Specifically, fairness is based on the Aristotle's maxim: "equals should be treated equally and unequals unequally, in proportion to the relevant inequality". In this context, fairness is achieved when all the individual stochastic surplus shares which are allocated to agents are distributed in proportion to the NBS. We introduce a novel algorithm, which can be used to compute the ratio of each pie that should be allocated to each agent, in order to ensure fairness within a symmetric or asymmetric NBS.

摘要

剩余的公平分配是最广泛研究的问题之一。本文侧重于具有固定分歧支付的讨价还价问题,其中风险中性的代理人已经达成了纳什讨价还价解决方案(NBS)的协议。我们考虑了一个随机环境,其中整体回报由多个不确定大小的馅饼组成,我们研究如何在代理人之间公平地分配这些馅饼。具体而言,公平是基于亚里士多德的格言:“平等的人应该平等对待,不平等的人应该按照相关的不平等程度不平等对待”。在这种情况下,当分配给代理人的所有单个随机剩余份额都按照 NBS 成比例分配时,就实现了公平。我们引入了一种新的算法,该算法可用于计算应分配给每个代理人的每个馅饼的比例,以确保在对称或不对称的 NBS 中实现公平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/459e/3443099/a7947d1b3175/pone.0044535.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/459e/3443099/423277373352/pone.0044535.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/459e/3443099/c9ab3a401d79/pone.0044535.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/459e/3443099/de2a33edbf0b/pone.0044535.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/459e/3443099/a7947d1b3175/pone.0044535.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/459e/3443099/423277373352/pone.0044535.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/459e/3443099/c9ab3a401d79/pone.0044535.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/459e/3443099/de2a33edbf0b/pone.0044535.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/459e/3443099/a7947d1b3175/pone.0044535.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
On the fair division of multiple stochastic pies to multiple agents within the Nash bargaining solution.在纳什谈判解内,将多个随机馅饼公平分配给多个代理。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044535. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
2
Asymmetric Bargaining Model for Water Resource Allocation over Transboundary Rivers.跨界河流水资源分配的非对称谈判模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 16;16(10):1733. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101733.
3
Random allocation of pies promotes the evolution of fairness in the Ultimatum Game.在最后通牒博弈中,随机分配馅饼会促进公平性的演变。
Sci Rep. 2014 Apr 1;4:4534. doi: 10.1038/srep04534.
4
Nash Bargaining Game-Theoretic Framework for Power Control in Distributed Multiple-Radar Architecture Underlying Wireless Communication System.用于无线通信系统底层分布式多雷达架构中功率控制的纳什议价博弈理论框架
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Apr 11;20(4):267. doi: 10.3390/e20040267.
5
Bargaining and fairness.讨价还价和公平。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 22;111 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):10785-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400819111. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
6
Two Monthly Continuous Dynamic Model Based on Nash Bargaining Theory for Conflict Resolution in Reservoir System.基于纳什议价理论的水库系统冲突解决双月连续动态模型
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 7;10(12):e0143198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143198. eCollection 2015.
7
Alternating-Offers Bargaining with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concerns.具有纳什议价公平关切的交替报价议价
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;13(2):124. doi: 10.3390/bs13020124.
8
Evolution of fairness and coalition formation in three-person ultimatum games.三人最后通牒博弈中公平性与联盟形成的演变
J Theor Biol. 2017 May 7;420:53-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.033. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
9
Partner selection and emergence of the merit-based equity norm.伙伴选择与基于功绩的公平规范的出现。
J Theor Biol. 2017 Mar 7;416:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.12.027. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
10
Fuzzy programming method for multi-objective optimal allocation of sediment resources and the cooperative bargaining: a case study in Weishan irrigation area, China.模糊规划方法在泥沙资源多目标优化配置及合作博弈中的应用——以中国微山湖地区为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Mar;27(7):7071-7086. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07420-z. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Dworkin's paradox.德沃金悖论。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038529. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
2
Waste management project's alternatives: A risk-based multi-criteria assessment (RBMCA) approach.废弃物管理项目的替代方案:基于风险的多标准评估方法(RBMCA)。
Waste Manag. 2012 Jan;32(1):194-212. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
3
Cooperation, norms, and revolutions: a unified game-theoretical approach.合作、规范和革命:一种统一的博弈论方法。
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 12;5(10):e12530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012530.
4
A geometrical perspective for the bargaining problem.讨价还价问题的几何视角。
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 26;5(4):e10331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010331.