• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加利福尼亚州腹腔镜与开放式结肠切除术:一项横断面分析。

Laparoscopic versus open colon resections in California: a cross-sectional analysis.

作者信息

Patel Supriya S, Patel Madhukar S, Mahanti Sanjit, Ortega Adrian, Ault Glenn T, Kaiser Andreas M, Senagore Anthony J

机构信息

Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2012 Oct;78(10):1063-5.

PMID:23025941
Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery is associated with decreased hospital length of stay, improved perioperative morbidity, and faster return to work compared with open procedures. Despite these benefits, laparoscopy has not been universally adopted with recent implementation estimates ranging from 10 to 30 per cent. The purpose of this study was to analyze the adoption of laparoscopic techniques for colon resections in California in 2009 based on institutional colectomy volume status. A total of 14,736 patients from 320 hospitals was analyzed. The laparoscopic to open case ratios for the low (zero to 17 cases/year), medium (18 to 50 cases/year), and high (greater than 50 cases/year) volume centers were: 0.32, 0.50, and 0.92, respectively. Although the data confirmed that a laparoscopic approach reduced length of stay (LOS) regardless of volume, lower adopters of laparoscopic colectomy had a longer overall total LOS, likely related to preponderance of open cases. Therefore, the data show that higher-volume institutions appear to have implemented laparoscopic colectomy for more of their case volume, and this adoption may account for the better institutional outcomes observed in these centers.

摘要

与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术具有缩短住院时间、降低围手术期发病率以及更快恢复工作的优点。尽管有这些益处,但腹腔镜手术尚未得到普遍采用,最近的实施率估计在10%至30%之间。本研究的目的是根据机构结肠切除术数量状况,分析2009年加利福尼亚州结肠切除术腹腔镜技术的采用情况。共分析了来自320家医院的14736例患者。低(每年0至17例)、中(每年18至50例)、高(每年超过50例)手术量中心的腹腔镜与开放手术病例比分别为:0.32、0.50和0.92。尽管数据证实,无论手术量多少,腹腔镜手术方法均能缩短住院时间,但腹腔镜结肠切除术采用率较低的机构总体住院时间更长,这可能与开放手术病例占优势有关。因此,数据表明,手术量较高的机构似乎对更多病例实施了腹腔镜结肠切除术,而这种采用情况可能是这些中心观察到更好的机构治疗效果的原因。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open colon resections in California: a cross-sectional analysis.加利福尼亚州腹腔镜与开放式结肠切除术:一项横断面分析。
Am Surg. 2012 Oct;78(10):1063-5.
2
Utilization of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery for cancer at academic medical centers: does site of surgery affect rate of laparoscopy?学术医疗中心腹腔镜在结直肠癌手术中的应用:手术部位是否会影响腹腔镜使用率?
Am Surg. 2011 Oct;77(10):1300-4.
3
Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of cancer has been widely adopted in the United States.腹腔镜结肠切除术已被广泛应用于美国癌症的治疗中。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 May;55(5):501-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318249ce5a.
4
Single-center comparative study of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a 2-year experience.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠手术的单中心比较研究:两年经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):29-32. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182433930.
5
Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers.腹腔镜结肠切除术在利用方面的趋势和转为开放手术的比率:对学术医疗中心的国家数据库审查。
Ann Surg. 2012 Sep;256(3):462-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182657ec5.
6
Impact of surgeon and hospital caseload on the likelihood of performing laparoscopic vs open sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: a study based on 55,949 patients.外科医生和医院病例数量对因憩室病行腹腔镜与开放式乙状结肠切除术可能性的影响:一项基于55949例患者的研究
Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;142(3):253-9; discussion 259. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.3.253.
7
Outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy: a national population-based comparison.腹腔镜与开放结肠切除术的结局:基于全国人群的比较
Surg Innov. 2008 Dec;15(4):277-83. doi: 10.1177/1553350608327171.
8
Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.腹腔镜与开放半结肠切除术
Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):491-502, 502-7.
9
Laparoscopic colon resections: a five-year retrospective review.腹腔镜结肠切除术:一项五年回顾性研究
Am Surg. 2000 Mar;66(3):245-8; discussion 248-9.
10
Outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy at academic centers.学术中心腹腔镜与开放结肠切除术的疗效
Am J Surg. 2008 Sep;196(3):403-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.11.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis.自主式机器人腹腔镜肠吻合术。
Sci Robot. 2022 Jan 26;7(62):eabj2908. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abj2908.
2
Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open colectomy for colon cancer.结肠癌微创手术与开放手术的短期疗效
J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
3
Adoption of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: It Was Quite a Journey.腹腔镜结直肠手术的应用:这是一段相当漫长的历程。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2015 Sep;28(3):131-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1560040.
4
Robotic-laparoscopic rectal cancer excision versus traditional laparoscopy.机器人腹腔镜直肠癌切除术与传统腹腔镜手术的比较
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00020.
5
Surgical outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer in obese patients: A comparative study with open colectomy.肥胖患者腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的手术结果:与开腹结直肠癌切除术的对比研究
Oncol Lett. 2013 Oct;6(4):1057-1062. doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1508. Epub 2013 Aug 2.