• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单轴螺钉和单轴椎弓根螺钉产生的终板力的生物力学比较。

Biomechanical comparison of endplate forces generated by uniaxial screws and monoaxial pedicle screws.

作者信息

Essig David A, Miller Christopher P, Xiao Ming, Ivancic Paul, Jegede Kola, Badrinath Raghav, Smith Brian G, Grauer Jonathan N

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2012 Oct;35(10):e1528-32. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120919-24.

DOI:10.3928/01477447-20120919-24
PMID:23027492
Abstract

Current surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis involves the use of various segmental instrumentation. Various pedicle screws have allowed for improved correction. Although monoaxial screws have improved rotational control compared with polyaxial screws, their use may increase screw-bone interface or vertebral endplate forces if not inserted in an exactly straight trajectory. Uniaxial screws potentially decrease these forces while retaining the advantages of monoaxial screws with respect to better rotational control. The purpose of this study was to compare the vertebral endplate forces with monoaxial or uniaxial screws when being reduced to a rod. Thirty-two plastic, surrogate T11 vertebrae were prepared with monoaxial (n=16) or uniaxial (n=16) screws. Screw angles relative to inferior vertebral endplates were assessed with lateral radiographs. The vertebrae were fixed to a load cell, and loads were measured as the screw was reduced to a rod. Monoaxial screws demonstrated a linear progression of endplate force with increasing screw angle. Uniaxial screws demonstrated minimal endplate force until approximately 20°, coinciding with screwhead excursion angle. As this maximum excursion angle was passed, uniaxial screws demonstrated a force slope similar to the monoaxial screws.The measured endplate forces should be equivalent to forces at the screw-bone interface. The reduced force with uniaxial screws is expected to have less cranial-caudal plow potential as the screw is coupled to a rod for deformity correction. This could have potential implications for screw failure, especially in less dense bone.

摘要

目前特发性脊柱侧弯的外科治疗涉及使用各种节段性内固定器械。各种椎弓根螺钉有助于提高矫正效果。尽管单轴螺钉与多轴螺钉相比改善了旋转控制,但如果未以完全笔直的轨迹插入,其使用可能会增加螺钉-骨界面或椎体终板的受力。单轴螺钉在保持单轴螺钉在更好旋转控制方面优势的同时,有可能降低这些受力。本研究的目的是比较单轴或单平面螺钉在与棒连接复位时的椎体终板受力情况。制备了32个塑料替代T11椎体,其中16个使用单轴螺钉,16个使用单平面螺钉。通过侧位X线片评估螺钉相对于下位椎体终板的角度。将椎体固定在测力传感器上,并在螺钉与棒连接复位时测量受力。单轴螺钉的终板受力随螺钉角度增加呈线性增加。单平面螺钉在大约20°之前终板受力最小,这与螺钉头偏移角度一致。当超过这个最大偏移角度时,单平面螺钉的受力斜率与单轴螺钉相似。所测量的终板受力应等同于螺钉-骨界面的受力。当单平面螺钉与棒连接用于畸形矫正时,其受力减小预计会降低头-尾向的犁骨力。这可能对螺钉失效有潜在影响,尤其是在骨密度较低的情况下。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical comparison of endplate forces generated by uniaxial screws and monoaxial pedicle screws.单轴螺钉和单轴椎弓根螺钉产生的终板力的生物力学比较。
Orthopedics. 2012 Oct;35(10):e1528-32. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120919-24.
2
Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of pedicle screws for scoliotic spine instrumentation.脊柱侧凸矫形内固定用 4 种椎弓根螺钉的生物力学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 15;37(14):E823-35. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824b7154.
3
Biomechanical analysis of corrective forces in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment.脊柱侧凸治疗中脊柱器械矫正力的生物力学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Nov 15;37(24):E1479-87. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182706745.
4
Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis.预防胸椎后凸畸形中后路脊柱内固定器械的远端拔出:一项生物力学分析
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Jun;22(4):270-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31816a6887.
5
Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.腰椎椎弓根螺钉的皮质骨轨迹
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):366-73. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 14.
6
A biomechanical investigation of different screw head designs for vertebral derotation in scoliosis surgery.脊柱侧弯手术中用于椎体去旋转的不同螺钉头部设计的生物力学研究。
Spine J. 2017 Aug;17(8):1171-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
7
Treatment of thoracic scoliosis: are monoaxial thoracic pedicle screws the best form of fixation for correction?胸椎侧弯的治疗:单轴胸椎椎弓根螺钉是矫正的最佳固定方式吗?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 15;34(8):845-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819e2753.
8
A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.胸腰椎固定中,对椎板下钩作为椎板上钩替代物的生物力学评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 20;31(9):967-71. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000214932.49027.6a.
9
How does a novel monoplanar pedicle screw perform biomechanically relative to monoaxial and polyaxial designs?相对于单轴和多轴设计,新型单平面椎弓根螺钉在生物力学方面表现如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Sep;472(9):2826-32. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3711-x. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
10
Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone.解剖轨迹椎弓根螺钉与可注射硫酸钙植骨增强椎弓根螺钉在尸体胸椎骨挽救中的生物力学比较
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Jun;19(4):286-91. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211203.31244.a0.

引用本文的文献

1
Is restoration of vertebral body height after vertebral body fractures and minimally-invasive dorsal stabilization with polyaxial pedicle screws just an illusion?椎体骨折后和经皮多轴椎弓根螺钉微创固定复位椎体高度是否只是一种假象?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jan;144(1):239-250. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05082-8. Epub 2023 Oct 15.