Centre for Mental Health and Risk, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Bldg., Oxford Rd., M13 9PL, Manchester, Lancashire M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Dec;63(12):1218-24. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100344.
This study examined associations between clinical, demographic, and criminological characteristics of inmates with mental illness and level of mental health intervention received during early custody.
In a prospective study, 3,079 participants entering five English jails were recruited and screened for mental illness with a standardized tool. Individuals who screened positive were assessed for mental illness and symptom severity within one week of arrival. Clinical records of those who received a diagnosis of mental illness (N=409) were reviewed for one month (or until discharge, if sooner) to determine mental health care interventions received. Main outcomes were the level of mental health intervention received (none, primary, or secondary) and whether an intervention was received from substance misuse services.
Compared with individuals who did not receive services, those who received primary mental health care were more likely to have a diagnosis of major depressive disorder than another mental illness (OR=2.01, CI=1.20–3.36). Compared with those who received primary care services, those who received secondary mental health care were more likely to have a diagnosis of psychosis (OR=3.34, CI=1.81–6.17). However, 23% of the sample received no intervention. Offenders with mental illness who misused drugs were more likely than those who misused alcohol alone to receive an intervention from substance misuse services (OR=3.67, CI=1.91–7.05).
Level of intervention was not consistently linked with diagnoses or symptom severity among inmates with mental illness. Triage processes should be improved to ensure that mental health care resources in jails are appropriately matched to clinical need.
本研究旨在探讨患有精神疾病的囚犯的临床、人口统计学和犯罪学特征与入狱初期接受心理健康干预的程度之间的关系。
在一项前瞻性研究中,招募了进入五所英国监狱的 3079 名参与者,并使用标准化工具对其进行精神疾病筛查。对筛查阳性的个体在抵达后一周内进行精神疾病评估和症状严重程度评估。对被诊断为精神疾病的个体(N=409)的临床记录进行回顾,以确定在一个月内(或如果提前出院)接受的心理健康护理干预措施。主要结局是接受心理健康干预的程度(无、初级或二级)以及是否接受了药物滥用服务的干预。
与未接受服务的个体相比,接受初级心理健康护理的个体更有可能被诊断为重度抑郁症,而不是其他精神疾病(OR=2.01,CI=1.20–3.36)。与接受初级护理服务的个体相比,接受二级心理健康护理的个体更有可能被诊断为精神病(OR=3.34,CI=1.81–6.17)。然而,23%的样本未接受任何干预。患有精神疾病且滥用药物的罪犯比仅滥用酒精的罪犯更有可能接受药物滥用服务的干预(OR=3.67,CI=1.91–7.05)。
干预程度与患有精神疾病的囚犯的诊断或症状严重程度并不完全相关。应改进分诊流程,以确保监狱中的心理健康护理资源与临床需求相匹配。