Suppr超能文献

二尖瓣置换术中二尖瓣装置保留与否:对3835例患者的荟萃分析

Preservation versus non-preservation of mitral valve apparatus during mitral valve replacement: a meta-analysis of 3835 patients.

作者信息

Sá Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira, Ferraz Paulo Ernando, Escobar Rodrigo Renda, Martins Wendell Santos, de Araújo e Sá Frederico Browne Correia, Lustosa Pablo César, Vasconcelos Frederico Pires, Lima Ricardo Carvalho

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery of Pronto Socorro Cardiológico de Pernambuco (PROCAPE), Recife, Brazil.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;15(6):1033-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs379. Epub 2012 Sep 30.

Abstract

Resection of the chordopapillary apparatus during mitral valve replacement has been associated with a negative impact on survival. Mitral valve replacement with the preservation of the mitral valve apparatus has been associated with better outcomes, but surgeons remain refractory to its use. To determine if there is any real difference in preservation vs non-preservation of mitral valve apparatus during mitral valve replacement in terms of outcomes, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL/CCTR, SciELO, LILACS, Google Scholar and reference lists of relevant articles to search for clinical studies that compared outcomes (30-day mortality, postoperative low cardiac output syndrome or 5-year mortality) between preservation vs non-preservation during mitral valve replacement from 1966 to 2011. The principal summary measures were odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval and P-values (that will be considered statistically significant when <0.05). The ORs were combined across studies using a weighted DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. The meta-analysis was completed using the software Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2 (Biostat Inc., Englewood, NJ, USA). Twenty studies (3 randomized and 17 non-randomized) were identified and included a total of 3835 patients (1918 for mitral valve replacement preservation and 1917 for mitral valve replacement non-preservation). There was significant difference between mitral valve replacement preservation and mitral valve replacement non-preservation groups in the risk of 30-day mortality (OR 0.418, P <0.001), postoperative low cardiac output syndrome (OR 0.299, P <0.001) or 5-year mortality (OR 0.380, P <0.001). No publication bias or important heterogeneity of effects on any outcome was observed. In conclusion, we found evidence that argues in favour of the preservation of mitral valve apparatus during mitral valve replacement.

摘要

二尖瓣置换术中切除腱索乳头肌装置对生存率有负面影响。保留二尖瓣装置进行二尖瓣置换与更好的预后相关,但外科医生仍不愿采用。为了确定在二尖瓣置换术中保留与不保留二尖瓣装置在预后方面是否存在实际差异,我们使用MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL/CCTR、SciELO、LILACS、谷歌学术以及相关文章的参考文献列表进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以寻找比较1966年至2011年间二尖瓣置换术中保留与不保留二尖瓣装置的预后(30天死亡率、术后低心排血量综合征或5年死亡率)的临床研究。主要汇总指标为比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间和P值(P<0.05时被认为具有统计学意义)。使用加权的DerSimonian-Laird随机效应模型对各研究的OR进行合并。使用Comprehensive Meta-Analysis版本2软件(美国新泽西州恩格尔伍德市Biostat公司)完成荟萃分析。共纳入20项研究(3项随机对照研究和17项非随机对照研究),总计3835例患者(二尖瓣置换保留组1918例,二尖瓣置换不保留组1917例)。二尖瓣置换保留组与二尖瓣置换不保留组在30天死亡率风险(OR 0.418,P<0.001)、术后低心排血量综合征(OR 0.299,P<0.001)或5年死亡率(OR 0.380,P<0.001)方面存在显著差异。未观察到发表偏倚或任何预后方面的重要效应异质性。总之,我们发现有证据支持在二尖瓣置换术中保留二尖瓣装置。

相似文献

2
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
3
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
7
Topical clonidine for neuropathic pain in adults.局部用可乐定治疗成人神经病理性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD010967. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010967.pub3.
8
Fast-track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients.针对成年心脏外科手术患者的快速心脏护理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD003587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003587.pub2.
9
Glucocorticosteroids for people with alcoholic hepatitis.用于酒精性肝炎患者的糖皮质激素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;11(11):CD001511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001511.pub3.

本文引用的文献

2
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
4
Effect of chordal preservation on left ventricular function.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2005 Sep;13(3):233-7. doi: 10.1177/021849230501300309.
8
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.评估荟萃分析中的异质性
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验