• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哺乳期长度对全国奶牛群温室气体排放的影响。

The effect of lactation length on greenhouse gas emissions from the national dairy herd.

机构信息

Sustainable Livestock Systems Group, Scottish Agricultural College, Roslin Institute Building, Easter Bush, Penicuik, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.

出版信息

Animal. 2012 Nov;6(11):1857-67. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000936.

DOI:10.1017/S1751731112000936
PMID:23031357
Abstract

Many governments have signed up to greenhouse gas emission (GHGE) reduction programmes under their national climate change obligations. Recently, it has been suggested that the use of extended lactations in dairy herds could result in reduced GHGE. Dairy GHGE were modelled on a national basis and the model was used to compare emissions from lactations of three different lengths (305, 370 and 440 days), and a current 'base' scenario on the basis of maintaining current milk production levels. In addition to comparing GHGE from the average 'National Herd' under these scenarios, results were used to investigate how accounting for lactations of different lengths might alter the estimation of emissions calculated from the National Inventory methodology currently recommended by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Data for the three lactation length scenarios were derived from nationally recorded dairy performance information and used in the GHGE model. Long lactations required fewer milking cows and replacements to maintain current milk yield levels than short ones, but GHGEs were found to rise from 1214 t of CO2 equivalent (CE)/farm per year for lactations of 305 days to 1371 t CE/farm per year for 440-day lactations. This apparent anomaly can be explained by the less efficient milk production (kg milk produced per kg cow weight) found in later lactation, a more pronounced effect in longer lactations. The sensitivity of the model to changes in replacement rate, persistency and level of milk yield was investigated. Changes in the replacement rate from 25% to 20% and in persistency by −10% to +20% resulted in very small changes in GHGE. Differences in GHGE due to the level of milk yield were much more dramatic with animals in the top 10% for yield, producing about 25% less GHGE/year than the average animal. National Inventory results were investigated using a more realistic spread of lactation lengths than recommended for such calculations using emissions calculated in the first part of the study. Current UK emission calculations based on the National Inventory were 329 Gg of methane per year from the dairy herd. Using the national distribution of lactation lengths, this was found to be an underestimate by about 10%. This work showed that the current rise in lactation length or a move towards calving every 18 months would increase GHGE by 7% to 14% compared with the current scenario, assuming the same milk yield in all models. Increased milk yield would have a much greater effect on reducing GHGE than changes to lactation length, replacement rate or persistency. National Inventory methodology appears to underestimate GHGE when the distribution of lactation lengths is considered and may need revising to provide more realistic figures.

摘要

许多政府根据国家气候变化义务签署了温室气体排放(GHGE)减排计划。最近,有人提出,在奶牛群中延长泌乳期可能会减少 GHGE。在国家基础上对奶牛 GHGE 进行了建模,并使用该模型比较了三种不同长度(305、370 和 440 天)的泌乳期和当前基于维持当前牛奶产量水平的“基础”情景的排放量。除了比较这些情景下平均“国家牛群”的 GHGE 外,结果还用于研究在不同长度的泌乳期的核算如何改变目前政府间气候变化专门委员会推荐的国家清单方法计算的排放量的估计。这三种泌乳期长度情景的数据来自全国记录的奶牛性能信息,并用于 GHGE 模型。与短期泌乳相比,长泌乳期需要更少的奶牛和替换品来维持当前的牛奶产量水平,但 GHGE 从 305 天泌乳期的每年 1214 吨二氧化碳当量(CE)/农场上升到 440 天泌乳期的每年 1371 吨 CE/农场。这种明显的反常现象可以用后期泌乳中发现的效率较低的牛奶产量(每公斤奶牛体重生产的牛奶量)来解释,在较长的泌乳期中这种影响更为明显。还研究了模型对替换率、持久性和牛奶产量水平变化的敏感性。替换率从 25%降至 20%,持久性从-10%变为+20%,GHGE 仅略有变化。由于产量水平的不同,GHGE 的差异要大得多,产量最高的 10%的动物每年产生的 GHGE 比平均动物少约 25%。使用本研究第一部分计算的排放量计算中推荐的更现实的泌乳期长度分布,研究了国家清单结果。基于国家清单,目前英国对奶牛群的甲烷排放量计算为每年 329 克。结果发现,这一数字比使用全国泌乳期长度分布的估计值低了约 10%。这项研究表明,与目前的情况相比,当前泌乳期长度的增加或转向每 18 个月产犊一次,将使 GHGE 增加 7%至 14%,假设所有模型中的牛奶产量相同。与泌乳期长度、替换率或持久性的变化相比,增加牛奶产量将对减少 GHGE 产生更大的影响。当考虑泌乳期长度分布时,国家清单方法似乎低估了 GHGE,可能需要修订以提供更现实的数字。

相似文献

1
The effect of lactation length on greenhouse gas emissions from the national dairy herd.哺乳期长度对全国奶牛群温室气体排放的影响。
Animal. 2012 Nov;6(11):1857-67. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000936.
2
Production, partial cash flows and greenhouse gas emissions of simulated dairy herds with extended lactations.延长泌乳期模拟奶牛群的生产、部分现金流量和温室气体排放。
Animal. 2019 May;13(5):1074-1083. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118002562. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Does increasing milk yield per cow reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A system approach.提高奶牛产奶量是否会减少温室气体排放?一种系统方法。
Animal. 2012 Jan;6(1):154-66. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111001467.
4
Effect of calving interval and parity on milk yield per feeding day in Danish commercial dairy herds.产犊间隔和胎次对丹麦商业奶牛场每日每头奶牛产奶量的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jan;99(1):621-33. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9583. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
5
Review: extended lactation in dairy cattle.综述:奶牛的延长哺乳期。
Animal. 2019 Jul;13(S1):s65-s74. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119000806.
6
Effect of different dry period lengths on milk production and somatic cell count in subsequent lactations in commercial Dutch dairy herds.商业荷兰奶牛场不同干奶期长度对随后泌乳期产奶量和体细胞数的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2013 May;96(5):2988-3001. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6297. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
7
Effect of feed-related farm characteristics on relative values of genetic traits in dairy cows to reduce greenhouse gas emissions along the chain.与饲料相关的农场特征对奶牛遗传性状相对值的影响,以减少整个产业链中的温室气体排放。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jul;98(7):4889-903. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8310. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
8
Composition, coagulation properties, and cheesemaking potential of milk from cows undergoing extended lactations in a pasture-based dairying system.在基于牧场的奶牛养殖系统中,经过延长哺乳期的奶牛的牛奶的组成、凝固特性和干酪制作潜力。
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Apr;93(4):1401-11. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2727.
9
Life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy production in Eastern Canada: a case study.加拿大东部地区乳制品生产温室气体排放的生命周期评估:案例研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Sep;95(9):5164-5175. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5229.
10
Short communication: do Holstein lactations of varied lengths have different characteristics?短讯:不同泌乳期的荷斯坦奶牛有不同的特征吗?
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Dec;94(12):6173-80. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4467.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of persistency for day 305 of lactation at the moment of the insemination decision.在做出授精决定时对泌乳第305天持续性的预测。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Nov 16;10:1264048. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1264048. eCollection 2023.
2
How does reproduction account for dairy farm sustainability?繁殖如何影响奶牛场的可持续性?
Anim Reprod. 2023 Aug 4;20(2):e20230066. doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0066. eCollection 2023.
3
The effects of breeding and selection on lactation in dairy cattle.育种与选择对奶牛泌乳的影响。
Anim Front. 2023 Jun 14;13(3):55-63. doi: 10.1093/af/vfad044. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Host genetics associated with gut microbiota and methane emission in cattle.宿主遗传学与牛的肠道微生物群和甲烷排放有关。
Mol Biol Rep. 2022 Aug;49(8):8153-8161. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07718-1. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
5
Enteric methane emissions by lactating and dry cows in the high Andes of Peru.秘鲁安第斯高地泌乳牛和干奶牛的肠道甲烷排放。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Mar 26;54(2):144. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03146-2.
6
Keeping Dairy Cows for Longer: A Critical Literature Review on Dairy Cow Longevity in High Milk-Producing Countries.延长奶牛饲养寿命:高产奶国家奶牛长寿的批判性文献综述
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 13;11(3):808. doi: 10.3390/ani11030808.
7
The effect of extended lactation on parameters of Wood's model of lactation curve in dairy Simmental cows.
Anim Biosci. 2021 Jun;34(6):949-956. doi: 10.5713/ajas.20.0347. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
8
The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017.2007 年至 2017 年期间,美国奶牛养殖业生产性能提高对环境影响的分析。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Jan 1;98(1). doi: 10.1093/jas/skz291.