• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你所说即我所说:共同行动对编码的影响。

Your words are my words: effects of acting together on encoding.

作者信息

Eskenazi Terry, Doerrfeld Adam, Logan Gordon D, Knoblich Guenther, Sebanz Natalie

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, & Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):1026-34. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.725058. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2012.725058
PMID:23035698
Abstract

Social influences on action and memory are well established. However, it is unknown how acting together affects the incidental encoding of information. The present study asked whether coactors encode information that is relevant to a partner's task, but irrelevant to their own task. In Experiment 1, participants performed a categorization task alone and together, followed by a surprise free recall test where they were asked to recall items from the categorization task. Recall was better not only for items that participants had responded to themselves, but also for items that their coactor had responded to, than for items that had not required a response. The same results were found in Experiment 2, even though financial incentives motivated participants to only encode words they had responded to themselves. Together, the findings suggest that performing tasks together can modulate how information relevant to coactors is processed. Shared task representations may act as a vehicle for establishing shared memories.

摘要

社会对行动和记忆的影响已得到充分证实。然而,共同行动如何影响信息的偶然编码尚不清楚。本研究探讨了共同行动者是否会编码与伙伴任务相关但与自身任务无关的信息。在实验1中,参与者单独和一起执行分类任务,随后进行意外自由回忆测试,要求他们回忆分类任务中的项目。结果发现,参与者不仅对自己做出反应的项目回忆得更好,而且对其共同行动者做出反应的项目的回忆也比对不需要做出反应的项目更好。在实验2中也发现了相同的结果,尽管经济激励促使参与者只编码他们自己做出反应的单词。总之,研究结果表明,共同执行任务可以调节与共同行动者相关的信息的处理方式。共享的任务表征可能是建立共享记忆的一种媒介。

相似文献

1
Your words are my words: effects of acting together on encoding.你所说即我所说:共同行动对编码的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):1026-34. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.725058. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
2
A causal contiguity effect that persists across time scales.在时间尺度上持续存在的因果连续性效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jan;39(1):297-303. doi: 10.1037/a0028463. Epub 2012 May 14.
3
The role of verbal and pictorial information in multimodal incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary.言语和图像信息在外语词汇多模态附带习得中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(7):1306-26. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.979211. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
4
Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall.共享编码与协作回忆的成本和收益。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jan;39(1):183-95. doi: 10.1037/a0028906. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
5
Orthographic neighborhood effects in recognition and recall tasks in a transparent orthography.透明正字法中识别和回忆任务的正字法邻域效应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(4):565-578. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000327. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
6
Is the survival-processing memory advantage due to richness of encoding?生存加工记忆优势是否归因于丰富的编码?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jul;39(4):1294-302. doi: 10.1037/a0031214. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
7
Beginning at the beginning: Recall order and the number of words to be recalled.从开头开始:回忆顺序以及要回忆的单词数量。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Aug;42(8):1282-92. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000234. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
8
[Deficits in memory retrieval: an argument in favor of frontal subcortical dysfunction in depression].[记忆提取缺陷:支持抑郁症前额叶皮质下功能障碍的一项论据]
Encephale. 1995 Jul-Aug;21(4):295-305.
9
Cognitive load hypothesis of item-method directed forgetting.项目法指向性遗忘的认知负荷假说
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(6):1110-22. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.644303. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
10
Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.编码方式可以通过检索方向影响记忆准确性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):516-21. doi: 10.1037/a0022217.

引用本文的文献

1
The joint memory effect: challenging the selfish stigma in Huntington's disease?联合记忆效应:对亨廷顿舞蹈症中自私污名的挑战?
Brain Commun. 2024 Dec 9;7(1):fcae440. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae440. eCollection 2025.
2
Does implicit mentalizing involve the representation of others' mental state content? Examining domain-specificity with an adapted Joint Simon task.内隐心理化是否涉及对他人心理状态内容的表征?使用改编后的联合西蒙任务检验领域特异性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Aug 14;11(8):230239. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230239. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Interpersonal eye-tracking reveals the dynamics of interacting minds.
人际眼动追踪揭示了互动思维的动态过程。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Mar 12;18:1356680. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1356680. eCollection 2024.
4
Instructing somebody else to act: motor co-representations in the instructor.指导他人行动:指导者的运动共同表征
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jan 10;11(1):230839. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230839. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Physical but not virtual presence of others potentiates implicit and explicit learning.他人的身体存在而非虚拟存在能增强内隐和外显学习。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 8;12(1):21205. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25273-4.
6
Beauty and Uncertainty as Transformative Factors: A Free Energy Principle Account of Aesthetic Diagnosis and Intervention in Gestalt Psychotherapy.美与不确定性作为变革性因素:格式塔心理治疗中审美诊断与干预的自由能原理阐释
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 13;16:906188. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.906188. eCollection 2022.
7
Socially induced false memories in the absence of misinformation.社会诱发的虚假记忆,在没有错误信息的情况下。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 11;12(1):7725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11749-w.
8
Contextual cueing in co-active visual search: Joint action allows acquisition of task-irrelevant context.共激活视觉搜索中的语境线索:联合行动允许获取与任务无关的语境。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 May;84(4):1114-1129. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02470-x. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
9
Effects of pointing movements on visuospatial working memory in a joint-action condition: Evidence from eye movements.指向运动对联合动作条件下视空间工作记忆的影响:来自眼动的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Feb;50(2):261-277. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01230-w. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
10
An approach to social flexibility: Congruency effects during spontaneous word-by-word interaction.一种社会灵活性方法:自发逐字互动中的一致性效应。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 24;15(6):e0235083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235083. eCollection 2020.