• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是否有可能实现零中心静脉导管相关血流感染的目标?

Is it possible to achieve a target of zero central line associated bloodstream infections?

机构信息

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;25(6):650-7. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32835a0d1a.

DOI:10.1097/QCO.0b013e32835a0d1a
PMID:23041775
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Central venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) result in poorer patient outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Reduced reimbursement for CLABSI events is now provided for hospitalized patients in the United States. Although a zero target is proposed, the feasibility has not been evaluated. The objective of this review is to identify factors contributing to CLABSI and determine whether current evidence supports attainment of a zero infection rate.

RECENT FINDINGS

Limitations of current surveillance methods and reporting of aggregate data impact on achieving target CLABSI rates. Standard prevention practices, including physician and patient preparation (e.g. hand hygiene), are frequently incorporated into bundles of care. CVC dwell time has been identified as means of risk stratification. Additional strategies (e.g. chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings, antimicrobial-coated devices) may be better used in patients with expected long dwell times. Non-ICU populations are increasingly targeted with prevention strategies, but expected rates of infection have not been proposed.

SUMMARY

A zero CLABSI rate should be the target only for ICU populations having CVCs with a dwell time of 1-9 days following aseptic insertion. Additional measures should be reserved for patients with expected longer dwell time. Refinement and validation of surveillance methodology is required before target CLABSI rates can be proposed for non-ICU populations.

摘要

目的综述

中心静脉导管(CVC)相关血流感染(CLABSIs)导致患者预后较差和医疗保健费用增加。目前,美国为住院患者提供与 CLABSI 相关事件的报销减少。尽管提出了零目标,但尚未评估其可行性。本综述的目的是确定导致 CLABSIs 的因素,并确定当前的证据是否支持实现零感染率。

最新发现

当前监测方法和汇总数据报告的局限性影响实现目标 CLABSI 率。标准预防措施,包括医生和患者准备(例如手卫生),经常纳入护理包中。CVC 留置时间已被确定为风险分层的手段。其他策略(例如氯己定浸渍敷料、抗菌涂层装置)可能更适用于预期留置时间较长的患者。非 ICU 人群越来越多地采用预防策略,但尚未提出预期感染率。

总结

只有在无菌插入后 1-9 天内留置时间为 1-9 天的 ICU 人群中,CLABSI 率应为零目标。对于预计留置时间较长的患者,应保留其他措施。在为非 ICU 人群提出目标 CLABSI 率之前,需要改进和验证监测方法。

相似文献

1
Is it possible to achieve a target of zero central line associated bloodstream infections?是否有可能实现零中心静脉导管相关血流感染的目标?
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;25(6):650-7. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32835a0d1a.
2
Emergency Department Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) Incidence in the Era of Prevention Practices.预防措施时代急诊科中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)的发生率
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;22(9):1048-55. doi: 10.1111/acem.12744.
3
Vital signs: central line-associated blood stream infections--United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009.生命体征:中心静脉导管相关血流感染——美国,2001 年、2008 年和 2009 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Mar 4;60(8):243-8.
4
Central line-associated bloodstream infection prevention.中心静脉导管相关性血流感染预防。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;25(4):412-22. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328355e4da.
5
Daily chlorohexidine gluconate bathing with impregnated cloths results in statistically significant reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections.每天使用浸渍氯己定葡萄糖酸盐的布进行擦浴可显著降低中心静脉相关血流感染的发生率。
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Dec;38(10):817-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.005.
6
Impact of revising the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System definition for catheter-related bloodstream infection in ICU: reproducibility of the National Healthcare Safety Network case definition in an Australian cohort of infection control professionals.修订重症监护病房导管相关血流感染的国家医院感染监测系统定义的影响:澳大利亚感染控制专业人员队列中国家医疗安全网络病例定义的可重复性
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Oct;37(8):643-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
7
The bundle "plus": the effect of a multidisciplinary team approach to eradicate central line-associated bloodstream infections.“加”束:多学科团队方法对根除中心静脉导管相关血流感染的影响
Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):868-76. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a8b01b.
8
Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Québec Intensive Care Units: Results from the Provincial Healthcare-Associated Infections Surveillance Program (SPIN).魁北克重症监护病房中心静脉导管相关血流感染:省级医疗相关感染监测项目(SPIN)的结果
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;37(10):1186-94. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.150. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
9
Beyond the intensive care unit bundle: Implementation of a successful hospital-wide initiative to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections.超越重症监护病房集束化措施:成功实施一项全院范围的举措以减少中心静脉导管相关血流感染
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Jun;42(6):685-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.02.026.
10
A multitiered strategy of simulation training, kit consolidation, and electronic documentation is associated with a reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections.模拟培训、工具整合和电子文档的多层次策略与中心静脉导管相关血流感染的减少有关。
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Jun;42(6):643-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.02.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing does not decrease central line-associated bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled trial.葡萄糖酸氯己定透明敷料不会降低重症患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染率:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):e12776. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12776. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
2
A comprehension scale for central-line associated bloodstream infection: Results of a preliminary survey and factor analysis.中心静脉导管相关性血流感染的理解量表:初步调查和因素分析的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203431. eCollection 2018.
3
Ethanol locks for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
乙醇封管预防导管相关血流感染:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Jul 24;18(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0548-y.
4
A quality assurance investigation of CLABSI events: are there exceptions to never?中心静脉导管相关血流感染事件的质量保证调查:“零容忍”是否存在例外情况?
J Infect Prev. 2018 Jan;19(1):22-28. doi: 10.1177/1757177417720997. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
5
Central line-associated bloodstream infections in Australian ICUs: evaluating modifiable and non-modifiable risks in Victorian healthcare facilities.澳大利亚重症监护病房中心静脉导管相关血流感染:评估维多利亚州医疗机构中可改变和不可改变的风险
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Oct;145(14):3047-3055. doi: 10.1017/S095026881700187X. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
6
Infection Risk in Sterile Operative Procedures.无菌手术操作中的感染风险
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Apr 22;113(16):271-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0271.
7
Central line associated blood stream infection rate after intervention and comparing outcome with national healthcare safety network and international nosocomial infection control consortium data.干预后中心静脉导管相关血流感染率,并将结果与国家医疗安全网络及国际医院感染控制联盟的数据进行比较。
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Sep;4(5):682-6. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.141499.
8
Reduction of central venous line-associated bloodstream infection rates by using a chlorhexidine-containing dressing.使用含氯己定的敷料降低中心静脉置管相关血流感染率。
Infection. 2014 Feb;42(1):155-9. doi: 10.1007/s15010-013-0519-7. Epub 2013 Aug 9.