University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Aggress Behav. 2013 Jan;39(1):13-29. doi: 10.1002/ab.21453. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
Four studies present the first evidence showing that public (vs. private) provocation augments triggered displaced aggression by increasing the perceived intensity of the provocation. This effect is shown to be independent of face-saving motivation. Following a public or private provocation, Study 1 participants were induced to ruminate or were distracted for 20 min. They then had an opportunity to aggress against another person who either acted in a neutral or mildly annoying fashion (viz. triggering event). As expected, the magnitude of the greater displaced aggression of those who ruminated before the triggering event compared with those distracted was greater under public than private provocation. Study 2 replicated the findings of Study 1 and confirmed that public provocations are experienced as more intense. Studies 3 and 4 both manipulated provocation intensity directly to show that it mediated the moderating effect of public/private provocation found in Study 1. The greater intensity of a public provocation increases reactivity to a subsequent trigger, which in turn, augments triggered displaced aggression.
四项研究首次提供证据表明,公众(相对于私人)挑衅通过增加挑衅的感知强度来增强引发的转移攻击。这种效应独立于保全面子的动机。在受到公众或私人挑衅后,研究 1 的参与者被诱导沉思或分心 20 分钟。然后,他们有机会对另一个以中立或轻度烦人的方式行事的人(即引发事件)进行攻击。正如预期的那样,与分心相比,在引发事件之前沉思的人表现出的更大的转移攻击的程度在公众挑衅下比在私人挑衅下更大。研究 2 复制了研究 1 的发现,并证实了公众挑衅被体验为更强烈。研究 3 和 4 都直接操纵挑衅强度,以表明它介导了研究 1 中发现的公共/私人挑衅的调节作用。公众挑衅的更大强度增加了对后续触发的反应性,从而增强了引发的转移攻击。