Suppr超能文献

D-二聚体与纤维蛋白原比值在诊断重症监护病房患者肺血栓栓塞症中的准确性

Accuracy of D-dimer:fibrinogen ratio to diagnose pulmonary thromboembolism in patients admitted to intensive care units.

作者信息

Hajsadeghi Shokoufeh, Kerman Scott R, Khojandi Mojtaba, Vaferi Helen, Ramezani Roza, Jourshari Negar M, Mousavi Sayyed A J, Pouraliakbar Hamidezar

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Cardiovasc J Afr. 2012 Sep;23(8):446-56. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2012-041.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) may increase D-dimer and decrease fibrinogen levels. However, in settings such as intensive care units (ICU) and in long-term hospitalised patients, several factors may influence D-dimer and fibrinogen concentrations and make them unreliable indicators for the diagnosis of PTE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of D-dimer:fibrinogen ratio (DDFR) for the diagnosis of PTE in ICU patients.

METHODS

ICU patients who were suspected of having a first PTE and had no history of using anti-coagulants and contraceptives were included in the study. Levels of D-dimer and fibrinogen were measured for each patient prior to any intervention. Angiography or CT angiography was done in order to establish a definite diagnosis for each patient. Suitable analytical tests were performed to compare means.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included in the study, of whom 41 had PTE and 40 did not. Mean values of D-dimer and fibrinogen were 3.97 ± 3.22 µg/ml and 560.6 ± 197.3 mg/dl, respectively. Significantly higher levels of D-dimer (4.65 ± 3.46 vs 2.25 ± 2.55 µg/ml, p = 0.006) and DDFR (0.913 ± 0.716 vs 483 ± 0.440 × 10-(3), p = 0.003) were seen in PTE patients than in those without PTE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed a 70.3% sensitivity and 70.1% specificity with a D-dimer value of 2.43 µg/ml (AUC = 0.714, p = 0.002) as the best cut-off point; and a 70.3% sensitivity and 61.6% specificity with a DDFR value of 0.417 × 10-(3) (AUC = 0.710, p = 0.004) as the best cut-off point. In backward stepwise regression analysis, DDRF (OR = 0.72, p = 0.025), gender (OR = 0.76, p = 0.049) and white blood cell count (OR = 1.11, p = 0.373) were modelled (p = 0.029, R(2) = 0.577).

CONCLUSION

For diagnosis of PTE, DDFR can be considered to have almost the same importance as D-dimer level. Moreover, it was possible to rule out PTE with only a D-dimer cut-off value < 0.43 mg/dl, without the use of DDFR. However, these values cannot be used as a replacement for angiography or CT angiography.

摘要

引言

肺血栓栓塞症(PTE)可能会使D - 二聚体升高并使纤维蛋白原水平降低。然而,在重症监护病房(ICU)等环境以及长期住院患者中,多种因素可能会影响D - 二聚体和纤维蛋白原浓度,使其成为PTE诊断的不可靠指标。本研究的目的是评估D - 二聚体:纤维蛋白原比值(DDFR)在ICU患者中诊断PTE的准确性。

方法

本研究纳入了疑似首次发生PTE且无抗凝剂和避孕药使用史的ICU患者。在进行任何干预之前,测量每位患者的D - 二聚体和纤维蛋白原水平。进行血管造影或CT血管造影以对每位患者做出明确诊断。进行合适的分析测试以比较均值。

结果

81名患者纳入研究,其中41例患有PTE,40例未患PTE。D - 二聚体和纤维蛋白原的均值分别为3.97±3.22μg/ml和560.6±197.3mg/dl。与未患PTE的患者相比,PTE患者的D - 二聚体水平(4.65±3.46 vs 2.25±2.55μg/ml,p = 0.006)和DDFR(0.913±0.716 vs 483±0.440×10⁻³,p = 0.003)显著更高。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析显示,以D - 二聚体值2.43μg/ml(AUC = 0.714,p = 0.002)作为最佳截断点时,灵敏度为70.3%,特异性为70.1%;以DDFR值0.417×10⁻³(AUC = 0.710,p = 0.004)作为最佳截断点时,灵敏度为70.3%,特异性为61.6%。在向后逐步回归分析中,建立了DDFR(OR = 0.72,p = 0.025)、性别(OR = 0.76,p = 0.049)和白细胞计数(OR = 1.11,p = 0.373)的模型(p = 0.029,R² = 0.577)。

结论

对于PTE的诊断,DDFR可被认为与D - 二聚体水平具有几乎相同的重要性。此外,仅使用D - 二聚体截断值<0.43mg/dl而不使用DDFR也有可能排除PTE。然而,这些值不能替代血管造影或CT血管造影。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc80/3721944/ed7e768dea2f/cvja-23-449-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验