• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传因素对神经损伤后大脑可塑性和恢复的影响。

The influence of genetic factors on brain plasticity and recovery after neural injury.

机构信息

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Neurol. 2012 Dec;25(6):682-8. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835a360a.

DOI:10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835a360a
PMID:23044515
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The fields of clinical genetics and pharmacogenetics are rapidly expanding. Genetic factors have numerous associations with injury and with treatment effects in the setting of neural plasticity and recovery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence is reviewed that established genetic variants, as well as some more recently described variants, are related to outcome after neural injury and in some cases are useful for predicting clinical course. In many cases, the interaction of genetics with clinical factors such as experience and therapy may be important. As an extension of this, genetic factors have been associated with differential response to a number of forms of therapy, including pharmacological, brain stimulation, psychotherapy, and meditation. Genetic variation might also have a significant effect on plasticity and recovery through key covariates such as depression or stress. A key point is that genetic associations might be most accurately identified when studied in relation to distinct forms of a disorder rather than in relation to broad clinical syndromes.

SUMMARY

Understanding genetic variation gives clinicians a biological signal that could be used to predict who is most likely to recover from neural injury, to choose the optimal treatment for a patient, or to supplement rehabilitation therapy.

摘要

目的综述

临床遗传学和药物遗传学领域正在迅速发展。遗传因素与神经可塑性和恢复过程中的损伤以及治疗效果有许多关联。

最近的发现

有证据表明,已确定的遗传变异体以及一些最近描述的变异体与神经损伤后的结果有关,在某些情况下,它们可用于预测临床病程。在许多情况下,遗传与经验和治疗等临床因素的相互作用可能很重要。在此基础上,遗传因素与多种形式的治疗反应相关,包括药物治疗、脑刺激、心理治疗和冥想。遗传变异通过关键的协变量(如抑郁或压力)也可能对可塑性和恢复产生重大影响。关键点是,当与特定形式的疾病而不是广泛的临床综合征相关联进行研究时,遗传关联可能最准确地确定。

总结

了解遗传变异为临床医生提供了生物学信号,可用于预测谁最有可能从神经损伤中恢复,为患者选择最佳治疗方法,或补充康复治疗。

相似文献

1
The influence of genetic factors on brain plasticity and recovery after neural injury.遗传因素对神经损伤后大脑可塑性和恢复的影响。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2012 Dec;25(6):682-8. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835a360a.
2
Pharmacogenetics of neural injury recovery.神经损伤恢复的药物遗传学。
Pharmacogenomics. 2013 Oct;14(13):1635-43. doi: 10.2217/pgs.13.152.
3
Genetic influences on neural plasticity.遗传对神经可塑性的影响。
PM R. 2010 Dec;2(12 Suppl 2):S227-40. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.09.011.
4
Brain plasticity and genetic factors.脑可塑性与遗传因素。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):282-99. doi: 10.1310/tsr1604-282.
5
Genetic Variation and Neuroplasticity: Role in Rehabilitation After Stroke.遗传变异与神经可塑性:在中风后康复中的作用。
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;41 Suppl 3(Suppl 3 IV STEP Spec Iss):S17-S23. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000180.
6
Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying neurorehabilitation after stroke in aged subjects.老年受试者中风后神经康复的细胞和分子机制。
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2008;49(3):279-302.
7
Brain plasticity and rehabilitation in stroke patients.中风患者的脑可塑性与康复
J Nippon Med Sch. 2015;82(1):4-13. doi: 10.1272/jnms.82.4.
8
Linking genes to neurological clinical practice: the genomic basis for neurorehabilitation.将基因与神经科临床实践相联系:神经康复的基因组基础。
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015 Jan;39(1):52-61. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000066.
9
Stroke Recovery Genetics.中风恢复遗传学
Stroke. 2016 Sep;47(9):2427-34. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.010648. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
10
Plasticity.可塑性
NeuroRx. 2006 Oct;3(4):420-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Cerebellar deep brain stimulation for chronic post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a phase I trial.小脑深部脑刺激治疗慢性脑卒中后运动康复:一项 I 期试验。
Nat Med. 2023 Sep;29(9):2366-2374. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02507-0. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
2
Baseline Predictors of Response to Repetitive Task Practice in Chronic Stroke.慢性脑卒中患者重复任务练习反应的基线预测因子。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Jul;36(7):426-436. doi: 10.1177/15459683221095171. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Methods for an Investigation of Neurophysiological and Kinematic Predictors of Response to Upper Extremity Repetitive Task Practice in Chronic Stroke.
慢性卒中患者上肢重复性任务练习反应的神经生理和运动学预测指标的研究方法
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2019 Dec;1(3-4). doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100024. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
4
Functional anomaly mapping reveals local and distant dysfunction caused by brain lesions.功能异常映射揭示了由脑损伤引起的局部和远程功能障碍。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 15;215:116806. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116806. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
5
Frailty, the determinants of health and the new evidence base.衰弱、健康的决定因素及新的证据基础
Aging Med (Milton). 2018 Mar 12;1(1):5-6. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12010. eCollection 2018 Jun.
6
Morphogenetic Variability as Potential Biomarker of Functional Outcome After Ischemic Stroke.形态发生变异性作为缺血性中风后功能转归的潜在生物标志物
Brain Sci. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):138. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9060138.
7
Subacute stroke physical rehabilitation evidence in activities of daily living outcomes: A systematic review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.亚急性脑卒中物理康复对日常生活活动结果的影响:一项对随机对照试验的Meta分析的系统评价
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(8):e14501. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014501.
8
Genome-wide association meta-analysis of functional outcome after ischemic stroke.全基因组关联荟萃分析缺血性脑卒中后功能结局。
Neurology. 2019 Mar 19;92(12):e1271-e1283. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007138. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
9
BDNF Genotype Interacts with Motor Function to Influence Rehabilitation Responsiveness Poststroke.脑源性神经营养因子基因型与运动功能相互作用以影响中风后的康复反应性。
Front Neurol. 2016 May 17;7:69. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00069. eCollection 2016.
10
Genetics as a molecular window into recovery, its treatment, and stress responses after stroke.遗传学作为洞察中风后恢复、治疗及应激反应的分子窗口。
J Investig Med. 2016 Jun;64(5):983-8. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000126. Epub 2016 Apr 4.