Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Apr;92(4):327-34. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31826edc7b.
Local corticosteroid (CS) injection has been widely used to treat carpal tunnel syndrome, but its invasiveness can cause several complications. In this study, the authors tested the efficacy of a new treatment method, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), compared with CS injection.
The authors carried out a randomized controlled trial comparing one session of ESWT (1000 shots at the maximal tolerable intensity) with one session of CS injection in 36 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Outcome measures including nerve conduction studies, a visual analog scale, and the Levine Self-assessment Questionnaire were performed at baseline and at 1 and 3 mos after treatment.
At baseline, there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the outcome parameters. Both groups showed a significant reduction in the visual analog scale at 1 and 3 mos after treatment compared with baseline. For the symptom severity score on the Levine Self-assessment Questionnaire, the ESWT group showed a significant reduction at 1 and 3 mos after treatment, whereas the CS injection group showed a significant reduction at 3 mos after treatment. For the nerve conduction parameters, there were mild but no significant improvements in the ESWT group, whereas the sensory nerve conduction velocity, the sensory nerve action potential amplitude, and the distal sensory and motor latencies of the median nerve were significantly improved in the CS injection group.
ESWT can be as useful as CS injection for relieving symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Furthermore, in contrast to CS injection, it has the merit of being noninvasive.
局部皮质类固醇(CS)注射已广泛用于治疗腕管综合征,但它的侵入性可能会引起多种并发症。在这项研究中,作者测试了一种新的治疗方法,即体外冲击波疗法(ESWT),与 CS 注射相比的疗效。
作者进行了一项随机对照试验,比较了 36 例腕管综合征患者单次 ESWT(最大耐受强度下 1000 次射击)与单次 CS 注射的效果。在基线、治疗后 1 个月和 3 个月时进行神经传导研究、视觉模拟量表和 Levine 自我评估问卷评估。
在基线时,两组之间的结局参数没有显著差异。两组在治疗后 1 个月和 3 个月时的视觉模拟量表评分均显著低于基线时。对于 Levine 自我评估问卷的症状严重程度评分,ESWT 组在治疗后 1 个月和 3 个月时均显著降低,而 CS 注射组仅在治疗后 3 个月时显著降低。对于神经传导参数,ESWT 组有轻微但无统计学意义的改善,而 CS 注射组的正中神经感觉神经传导速度、感觉神经动作电位幅度以及远端感觉和运动潜伏期均有显著改善。
ESWT 可与 CS 注射一样有效缓解腕管综合征的症状。此外,与 CS 注射相比,它具有非侵入性的优点。