• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波疗法作为腕管综合征的一种保守治疗选择:一项双盲、前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照研究。

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy as a conservative treatment option for carpal tunnel syndrome: A double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

作者信息

Koçak Ulucaköy Rezan, Yurdakul Fatma Gül, Bodur Hatice

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Nov 9;66(4):388-397. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.3956. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.5606/tftrd.2020.3956
PMID:33364558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7756840/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) compared to the wrist splint treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 2016 and March 2017, a total of 189 patients (22 males, 167 females, mean age 48.8±9.5 years, range, 24 to 70 years) with mild-to-moderate CTS were included in this double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. The patients were divided into four treatment groups using stratified randomization: splint group (Group 1, n=47), splint+ESWT (Group 2, n=47), ESWT (Group 3, n=45), and splint+placebo ESWT (Group 4, n=50). All patients were evaluated at baseline, and one and three months. Pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), finger pinch strength, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS), and electrophysiological examination were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients completed the study. There was no significant difference among the four groups in terms of age, sex, comorbid diseases, symptom duration, VAS-pain, BCTQ, and LANSS scores (p>0.05). Pain and functionality significantly improved in all groups (p<0.05). In the group with ESWT and using wrist splint combined, a greater improvement of the hand function and electrophysiological measures was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our study results show that ESWT is a valuable and reliable treatment modality for mild-to-moderate CTS.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)与腕部夹板治疗相比,在腕管综合征(CTS)中的疗效。

患者与方法

在2016年4月至2017年3月期间,共有189例轻至中度CTS患者(22例男性,167例女性,平均年龄48.8±9.5岁,范围24至70岁)纳入这项双盲、前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照研究。采用分层随机化将患者分为四个治疗组:夹板组(第1组,n = 47)、夹板+ESWT组(第2组,n = 47)、ESWT组(第3组,n = 45)和夹板+安慰剂ESWT组(第4组,n = 50)。所有患者在基线、1个月和3个月时进行评估。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛、手指捏力、波士顿腕管问卷(BCTQ)、利兹神经病理性症状和体征评估(LANSS),并进行电生理检查。

结果

共有168例患者完成研究。四组在年龄、性别、合并疾病、症状持续时间、VAS疼痛评分、BCTQ和LANSS评分方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。所有组的疼痛和功能均有显著改善(p<0.05)。在联合使用ESWT和腕部夹板的组中,观察到手部功能和电生理指标有更大改善。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,ESWT是治疗轻至中度CTS的一种有价值且可靠的治疗方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff8/7756840/0d5cfc070b93/TJPMR-2020-66-4-388-397-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff8/7756840/db9023abe580/TJPMR-2020-66-4-388-397-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff8/7756840/0d5cfc070b93/TJPMR-2020-66-4-388-397-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff8/7756840/db9023abe580/TJPMR-2020-66-4-388-397-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff8/7756840/0d5cfc070b93/TJPMR-2020-66-4-388-397-F2.jpg

相似文献

1
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy as a conservative treatment option for carpal tunnel syndrome: A double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.体外冲击波疗法作为腕管综合征的一种保守治疗选择:一项双盲、前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Nov 9;66(4):388-397. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.3956. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Clinical and electrophysiological efficacy of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome: a placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.体外冲击波疗法治疗腕管综合征的临床和电生理疗效:一项安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Feb 17;69(1):124-130. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220943. eCollection 2023.
3
Effect of radial shock wave therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.桡骨冲击波疗法治疗腕管综合征的效果:一项前瞻性随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
J Orthop Res. 2016 Jun;34(6):977-84. doi: 10.1002/jor.23113. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
4
Physical therapy versus radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized-controlled study.物理治疗与桡侧体外冲击波治疗腕管综合征的随机对照研究
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Mar 1;68(1):126-135. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.7187. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
The dose-dependent efficiency of radial shock wave therapy for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial.径向冲击波治疗腕管综合征患者的剂量依赖性疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 2;6:38344. doi: 10.1038/srep38344.
6
Effectiveness of Lavendula stoechas essential oil in treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.薰衣草精油治疗轻中度腕管综合征的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Hand Ther. 2018 Oct-Dec;31(4):437-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
7
Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for pillar pain after open carpal tunnel release: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study.体外冲击波疗法治疗开放性腕管松解术后柱部疼痛的疗效:一项双盲、随机、假对照研究。
Korean J Pain. 2021 Jul 1;34(3):315-321. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.3.315.
8
A randomized clinical trial on the changing of median nerve cross-sectional area and pain after extracorporeal shock wave and low-level laser therapy added to conventional physical therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome.一项关于体外冲击波和低强度激光疗法联合传统物理治疗对轻至中度腕管综合征患者正中神经横截面积变化及疼痛影响的随机临床试验。
J Hand Ther. 2024 Oct-Dec;37(4):555-562. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.12.009. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
9
A randomized controlled trial: comparing extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus local corticosteroid injection for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.一项随机对照试验:比较体外冲击波疗法与局部皮质类固醇注射治疗腕管综合征。
Int Orthop. 2020 Jan;44(1):141-146. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04432-9. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
10
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Provides Limited Therapeutic Effects on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体外冲击波疗法对腕管综合征的治疗效果有限:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 May 19;58(5):677. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050677.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of high- and low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome.高剂量与低剂量桡侧体外冲击波疗法治疗腕管综合征的比较
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 May 2;71(3):e20241815. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20241815. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on nerve conduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波疗法对神经传导的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2024 Nov 22;15:1493692. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1493692. eCollection 2024.
3
Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Updated Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The dose-dependent efficiency of radial shock wave therapy for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial.径向冲击波治疗腕管综合征患者的剂量依赖性疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 2;6:38344. doi: 10.1038/srep38344.
2
Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on the treatment of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.体外冲击波疗法对腕管综合征患者的治疗效果。
Adv Biomed Res. 2016 Jul 29;5:120. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.186983. eCollection 2016.
3
Effect of radial shock wave therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
体外冲击波疗法对轻至中度腕管综合征患者的影响:一项更新的系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 28;12(23):7363. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237363.
4
Splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome.腕管综合征的夹板固定。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 27;2(2):CD010003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010003.pub2.
5
Application of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in nervous system diseases: A review.体外冲击波疗法在神经系统疾病中的应用:综述
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 17;13:963849. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.963849. eCollection 2022.
6
Physical therapy versus radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized-controlled study.物理治疗与桡侧体外冲击波治疗腕管综合征的随机对照研究
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Mar 1;68(1):126-135. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.7187. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Provides Limited Therapeutic Effects on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体外冲击波疗法对腕管综合征的治疗效果有限:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 May 19;58(5):677. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050677.
桡骨冲击波疗法治疗腕管综合征的效果:一项前瞻性随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
J Orthop Res. 2016 Jun;34(6):977-84. doi: 10.1002/jor.23113. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
4
Comparison of shock wave therapy and nutraceutical composed of Echinacea angustifolia, alpha lipoic acid, conjugated linoleic acid and quercetin (perinerv) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.冲击波疗法与由狭叶紫锥菊、α-硫辛酸、共轭亚油酸和槲皮素组成的营养补充剂(Perinerv)治疗腕管综合征患者的比较。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2015 Jun;28(2):256-62. doi: 10.1177/0394632015584501. Epub 2015 May 7.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy and ultrasound therapy improve pain and function in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. A randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波疗法和超声疗法可改善腕管综合征患者的疼痛和功能。一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Oct;51(5):521-8. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
6
Effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on functional recovery and neurotrophin-3 expression in the spinal cord after crushed sciatic nerve injury in rats.体外冲击波疗法对大鼠坐骨神经挤压伤后脊髓功能恢复及神经营养因子-3表达的影响
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Mar;41(3):790-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.10.015. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
7
Focused low-energy extracorporeal shock waves with distally symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPNP): a pilot study.聚焦低能量体外冲击波治疗远端对称性多发性神经病(DSPNP):一项初步研究。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2014 Jan 1;35(2):227-33. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141116.
8
Radial shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic constriction injury model in rats: a preliminary study.大鼠慢性压迫性损伤模型的径向冲击波治疗:一项初步研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(5):830-4.
9
Relationship between electrodiagnostic severity and neuropathic pain assessed by the LANSS pain scale in carpal tunnel syndrome.腕管综合征中 LANSS 疼痛量表评估的电诊断严重程度与神经病理性疼痛之间的关系。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:65-71. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S38513. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
10
The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs. local steroid injection for management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波疗法与局部类固醇注射治疗腕管综合征的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Apr;92(4):327-34. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31826edc7b.