Suppr超能文献

对比增强超声与 CT 血管造影在开窗型 EVAR 监测中的应用:单中心比较。

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT angiography in fenestrated EVAR surveillance: a single-center comparison.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Université Lille Nord de France, Hôpital Cardiologique, CHRU de Lille, France.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Oct;19(5):648-55. doi: 10.1583/JEVT-12-3909R.1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as an effective alternative to computed tomographic angiography (CTA) during follow-up after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and April 2011, 62 patients (all men; mean age 72 years) underwent fenestrated EVAR follow-up with both CTA and CEUS. In a retrospective analysis, the first CTA and CEUS postoperative examinations after EVAR were compared for endoleak detection, aneurysm sac diameter, and target vessel patency. The examinations were performed within 30 days of the procedure and the interval between the 2 scans was <7 days. Only fenestrated endografts with up to 3 fenestrations (with or without a scallop) were eligible so that the entire implant could be visualized with standard abdominal ultrasound.

RESULTS

The mean diameters of the aneurysm sac were 56.58±8.56 mm with CEUS and 57.70±8.59 mm with CTA. The mean difference in aneurysm sac diameter was -1.13±3.19 mm (95% CI -0.34 to -1.92), with CTA measurements tending to be slightly larger. Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between the imaging modalities with respect to aneurysm sac diameter (Spearman correlation coefficient r(s)=0.921, p<0.01). Endoleaks were detected by CTA in 7 (11.3%) of 62 patients and by CEUS in 6 (9.7%). In 59 (95.16%) cases, the tests agreed, and their equivalence was confirmed by binomial distribution testing. There was complete agreement between CEUS and CTA in the assessment of target vessels (144/146 patent target arteries; 1 had a significant stenosis and another was thrombosed).

CONCLUSION

CEUS is as accurate as CTA in endoleak detection, abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurement, and the evaluation of target vessels during surveillance of fenestrated stent-grafts. Although it cannot yet be proposed as the only imaging modality during follow-up, CEUS could be usefully employed with the self-evident advantage of reducing lifetime exposure to ionizing radiation.

摘要

目的

评估对比增强超声(CEUS)作为肾下型腹主动脉瘤腔内修复(EVAR)后随访中 CT 血管造影(CTA)的有效替代方法。

方法

2008 年 1 月至 2011 年 4 月期间,62 例患者(均为男性;平均年龄 72 岁)接受了 CTA 和 CEUS 联合检查。在回顾性分析中,将 EVAR 术后首次 CTA 和 CEUS 检查进行对比,以检测内漏、动脉瘤囊直径和靶血管通畅性。这些检查在手术后 30 天内进行,两次扫描之间的间隔时间<7 天。仅对有最多 3 个开窗(有或无扇贝)的覆膜支架进行分析,以便使用标准腹部超声即可观察到整个植入物。

结果

CEUS 组的动脉瘤囊平均直径为 56.58±8.56mm,CTA 组为 57.70±8.59mm。CEUS 组的动脉瘤囊直径平均差值为-1.13±3.19mm(95%CI -0.34 至 -1.92),CTA 组的测量值略大。Bland-Altman 图显示,两种成像方式在评估动脉瘤囊直径方面具有良好的一致性(Spearman 相关系数 r(s)=0.921,p<0.01)。CTA 检测到 7 例(11.3%)患者存在内漏,CEUS 检测到 6 例(9.7%)。在 59 例(95.16%)患者中,两种检查结果一致,二项分布检验证实其具有等效性。CEUS 和 CTA 在评估靶血管方面完全一致(144/146 个靶动脉通畅;1 个有显著狭窄,另 1 个发生了血栓)。

结论

CEUS 在检测内漏、测量腹主动脉瘤直径和评估支架通畅性方面与 CTA 一样准确。尽管它还不能作为随访的唯一影像学方法,但 CEUS 可以在减少终生电离辐射暴露方面发挥明显优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验