Suppr超能文献

老年医学教育中的知识-态度脱节:能否克服?

The knowledge-attitude dissociation in geriatric education: can it be overcome?

机构信息

Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, 16 Medical Drive, Singapore.

出版信息

Ann Acad Med Singap. 2012 Sep;41(9):383-9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A knowledge-attitude dissociation often exists in geriatrics where knowledge but not attitudes towards elderly patients improve with education. This study aims to determine whether a holistic education programme incorporating multiple educational strategies such as early exposure, ageing simulation and small group teaching results in improving geriatrics knowledge and attitudes among medical students.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We administered the 18-item University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Geriatric Knowledge Test (GKT) and the Singapore-modified 16-item UCLA Geriatric Attitudes Test (GAT) to 2nd year students of the old curriculum in 2009 (baseline reference cohort, n = 254), and before and after the new module to students of the new curriculum in 2010 (intervention cohort, n = 261), both at the same time of the year.

RESULTS

At baseline, between the baseline reference and intervention cohort, there was no difference in knowledge (UCLA-GKT Score: 31.6 vs 33.5, P = 0.207) but attitudes of the intervention group were worse than the baseline reference group (UCLA-GAT Score: 3.53 vs 3.43, P = 0.003). The new module improved both the geriatric knowledge (UCLA-GKT Score: 34.0 vs 46.0, P <0.001) and attitudes (UCLA-GAT Score: 3.43 vs 3.50, P <0.001) of the intervention cohort.

CONCLUSION

A geriatric education module incorporating sound educational strategies improved both geriatric knowledge and attitudes among medical students.

摘要

简介

老年医学中经常存在知识-态度分离现象,即随着教育的进行,知识得到提高,但对老年患者的态度却没有改善。本研究旨在确定是否将包含多种教育策略(如早期接触、老龄化模拟和小组教学)的整体教育计划能够提高医学生对老年医学的知识和态度。

材料和方法

我们对 2009 年旧课程的二年级学生(基线参考队列,n=254)和 2010 年新课程的学生(干预队列,n=261)进行了 18 项加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)老年知识测试(GKT)和新加坡改良的 16 项 UCLA 老年态度测试(GAT)。同年的同一时间进行。

结果

在基线时,基线参考队列和干预队列之间在知识方面没有差异(UCLA-GKT 评分:31.6 对 33.5,P=0.207),但干预组的态度比基线参考组差(UCLA-GAT 评分:3.53 对 3.43,P=0.003)。新模块提高了干预组的老年医学知识(UCLA-GKT 评分:34.0 对 46.0,P<0.001)和态度(UCLA-GAT 评分:3.43 对 3.50,P<0.001)。

结论

一个包含合理教育策略的老年医学教育模块提高了医学生对老年医学的知识和态度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验